In his 1984 murder of a Vicchio, the penultimate, the hands-on exhibits excision of the pubis to the poor girl killed herself, and had done so twice in 1981. Added plus the mutilation of the left breast and repeated the following year to Scopeti, then when they sent a piece as a challenge to investigators. Why, after having neglected this part of the body in the two previous operations of mutilation murders in the last two turned his attention to it? Because I sent a fragment, and because his challenge in this preferred to use the breast and not the pubis?
As for the pubic, but the operation was not performed on the breast in the throes of sexual arousal. The murderess tried to cut exactly the part with extreme coldness, leaving the impression that he was interested in his possession, as stated in the report De Fazio exit before the street crime Scopeti:
that excision breast cancer is aimed at some form of conservation and not looking for a sadistic satisfaction achieved with the extra rage on the victim, is evidenced once again by the care, the attention, the precision with which the transaction was conducted, not only in the intermediate and final stages, but even in those early, very thoughtful, judging by the many nicks "Test" found on the victim's chest at the top and outside of the breast excised .
According to the team of Modena, then, was interested to take away the breast for rimirarsela then closed in peace in his refuge. But this hypothesis has two important weaknesses.
The first is the preservation of the find, almost impossible even in formalin, being composed almost entirely of fatty tissue. So if the monster had wanted to "enjoy" what would be removed only for a short time.
The other weak point is the choice of one breast. It seems hard to believe that the murderess would have been satisfied only if she had a sexual meaning attributed to the trophy removed. Breast In fact, as a sexual valence, is composed of both breasts. In fact, in the large list of maniacs that persecutes the breasts of women killed, cut or bite, the Monster of Florence was practically the only one that was limited only by one, as also from what can be read here
Typically, serial killers do not have a specific preference for one of her breasts and got excited with the same enthusiasm on both. One of the peculiarities of the "Monster of Florence" is undoubtedly to maim always and exclusively the left breast and, in international cases, we have a previous finding of this unusual practice: Gary Robbins was a Salesman American women only attacked in their apartments, and stabbed repeatedly fired, before killing, burning with a cigarette in the left breast of the stabbing victim and concentrated mainly in this area.
What significance should be attributed then the operation? It was probably a gesture of pure media value, an element of theatrical performance that the murderess was introduced in response to a provocation that he seemed to have received statements from the famous sexologist George Abraham in an interview after the exit Giogoli of double murder. The professor tried to explain why the Monster in its operations to mutilate the corpse of the female victim, until that moment had never involved the breast. According to Abraham this behavior revealed a character suffering from a tormented Oedipal complex. The sexologist had taken some concepts from the famous American psychoanalyst Melanie Klein, he theorized about the relationship of dependency between mothers and children. In particular, the murderer was given a mother loved but overly authoritarian, that mutilation on female victims wanted to punish him, but did not have the courage to touch her breasts, part of the body with a strong symbolic meaning. Unfortunately
reproduction of the article in question does not seem to be available online, or you have news about what was the head where it was published. However, due to it are some references, for example in the book "A man almost normal" Roger Perugini (pg.77-78, 125-126) and in two interviews that the prof. De Fazio granted to "The Nation" and "The City" both published on 11 September 1985 in the aftermath of the murder of street Scopeti:
I think the maniac is an avid reader of newspapers. When he cut a breast for the first time he did so after a sex therapist who had given an interview in which he said that he always saved that way. Yes, the show follows the press and adjusting his technique. The stereotype of his monster and the perception that he himself shall be adjusted to how others perceive him.
...
You journalists need to be careful what you write. Recall that once a sex therapist described the monster as a mama's boy, one that removes the pubis, but not breast, maternal symbol. Well, he immediately cut off the breasts of the girl Vicchio and it was repeated with the French.
stripping sexual content of the removal of the left breast and giving it a meaning the media, the picture becomes more plausible: it justifies the lack of lust in the cut and its accuracy, probably due to the image that ' murderess wanted to give of themselves, justify the choice of one breast, which could suffice as a response to Abraham, you eliminate the doubts about its preservation, not needed, was simply thrown away. It also gives you a sense of sending a fragment Breast same investigators, the completion of the response to the provocation of the Monster sexologist, as if to say: " Here, this is what you wanted . Why have to choose just the breast to remove the fragment?
Regarding the latter case there is a problem to be overcome, however, because the monster's crime via Scopeti expected to send the fragment is not sent immediately after Vicchio? Probably he did, but given the inaccuracies of illiterate when he compiled his address in the envelope year after it is not unlikely that his letter addressed why it is lost evil. Had arrived, it is conceivable that Scopeti the operation was not repeated. Years later, during the investigation of the Companions of snacks, the repentant Giancarlo Lotti spoke of an envelope with something Pacciani sent by a friend to the girl who was killed after Vicchio ("Companions of blood," pp. 104-111) . According to the defense of the Vanni Mario Lotti was simply confused and Vicchio Scopeti, proving once again that he had invented everything, but we really sure that was so?
0 comments:
Post a Comment