Some of those who believe that whoever killed a Signa in 1968 was not the monster but the apples with accomplices solve the problem of handover gun in a radical way: just did not happen, then two different weapons were used. The assumption of course clashes with the results of ballistics, because the two shell casings recovered from the old file on the murder resulted Signa expelled from the same gun used in subsequent crimes. But according to proponents of the theory of different guns, the two shells were placed in the file by the same monster that replaced the old and came from an entirely different weapon with two of his. And this in order to send investigators out of the way that it will peg away for years trying to get away without a monster among the Sardinians from a spider hole, while the killer was killing Florentine undisturbed. In short, a real screening, to complete the monster who sent an anonymous note to the Carabinieri who invited them to go check that old crime.
The anonymous note sent in all probability the very after the murder of Baccaiano in 1982, but this of course does not mean that he also made the replacement of the cartridge cases, if in fact the Monster was a character totally alien to the clan of the Sardinians who had killed in 1968 and came into possession of the gun behind their backs, the result did not change, and in all probability this was the case. But let us see the weaknesses of the theory that would replace the Monster Signa cartridge cases in the file. First our
have been so fortunate to have available in the historical crimes just a double homicide occurred in the area around Florence consumed a few years before his 1974 and above all committed with a .22-caliber gun like the one he used for more ever found. Not only in the area around Florence but throughout Italy there would be to find another crime of that type. It would be enough already to make this place the hypothesis between romance fantasies.
If we accept the sheer luck that the Monster would have helped him to find just the crime, it remains unclear how he would do to access the old file. The first thing was to be a judge or something like that, having permission to enter the archive the Court of Assizes of Perugia, where the issue lay buried among thousands of others. And no one should have been aware of it, despite the probable controls. If such a scene can feel comfortable in a crime movie, in reality it is hard to accept.
Finally it can be assumed that the ballistics expert who had made the general Innocent Zuntini contained in the dossier were provided with photographs of the shells examined, the Monster would replace those too? It should also be considered that the general, while a senior in 1982 was still well and could intervene if the matter had been subject to manipulation. According Filastò (History of the infamous snacks, p. 113) even then was considered Zuntini as a probable model of the gun a Beretta 73/74 too old, worn and shabby, exactly what had turned out to experts who had dealt with the crimes later.
Finally, the two shells in the file there should have been, it was the sake of Zuntini to prevent their destruction, instead of sending them to the National Division Artillery process is completed, he appended them to the file (History of snacks infamous p.112). In short, the Monster would be lucky to find a similar crime committed with a gun to her like his own which never found and the file still contains the shells that normally would not have been there. A bit too real.
So the hypothesis replacement of cartridge cases from the Monster Signa is good to put aside the confusion in the story is already too much. Of course, remains the mystery of how did this gun change hands. In one of the next post will examine the hypothesis "Charles" by Mario Spezi.
0 comments:
Post a Comment