E 'a few weeks ago, news of a new film about the Monster of Florence. It will be executed in the United States, in the wake of the book "Sweet Hills of Blood" by Douglas Preston and Mario Spezi, and will among the protagonists of the funny and talented George Clooney. And 'yet another demonstration of the continuing interest to evoke the terrible story of the eight double murder that took place between 1968 and 1985 near Florence. But it is conceivable that even after watching this film, as the drama broadcast on Sky, the viewer will feel dissatisfied and frustrated, because the story remains without satisfactory explanation. It will not be the unlikely hypothesis "Charles" by Mario Spezi to satisfy the legitimate curiosity of those who have paid the ticket.
Also this blog will address the topic, but try to say something new compared to the usual considerations and tired of those who have lost hope that the mystery will be solved sooner or later. The writer is fully agree with those who believe the incredible truth of all exits from the trial of the Companions of Snacks: it was just a gigantic deception in which we were all fooled. But the truth is not necessarily out of reach, the truth might be in everyone's eyes, like a hidden image in ambiguous figures of Gelstat. This blog wants to find that image through a discussion of the known elements of the story trying to look at them from a perspective of common sense. The writer will offer his reflections on what the reader will naturally intervene with criticism, as long as polite. It will be even smaller pieces disconnected from each other. That will not blog it to assume the burden of telling the whole story, there are others on which the reader who does not know well can go to learn everything there is to know the link to the right lead to where you need it. Let's just say that the visitor should be the type already passionate and wants to be confronted with new points of view on this story. A few more on this premise introduction to the blog, before tackling the first of the topics for consideration.
E 'well first of all say something about the identity of who is writing. I'm just a fan like many others, to be pretty recent though those who were there. It 'was the fiction broadcast on Sky, saw last spring, so with a little 'delay, to tickle my curiosity, and to induce me to be interested in the case after years of hopeless indifference to the absurd folk who had taken the investigation. But I tried to recover the lost time in months of reading and reasoning.
You will already know, but it is worth pointing out that the writer believes that the murderess known as the Monster of Florence has been one bloodthirsty serial killer. Not seven, then, and no patrons of macabre fetish. The poor short Narducci would let him rest in peace. Can I add that I believe the murderer was motivated by criminal motives were never fully understood and that we will analyze here.
And now, good blog at all. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment