Gamecopyworld Age Of Empire 3

The dynamics of Baccaiano

We have seen the previous post as an alternative to the official reconstruction of the dynamics of the double murder of Baccaiano proposal Advocate Nino Filastò face water from all sides: to solve a problem it introduces many more. The problem to solve, remember, is the discrepancy between the testimonies of children who had first spoken to Paolo Mainardi seen sitting in the driving seat, and the ambulance arrived later that he had been found on the back seat.

Let's see a possible reconstruction of whole dynamic in which he will also address the problem of the discrepancy between the two testimonies. I shall avail myself of the photos posted on Caliber 22 ( here) and the schemino below. In it are indicated with red rectangles the initial position of the car down on the pitch and end up riding the brink of the ditch. By the numbers shows the nine shell casings found in the timeline that the writer assumed as a logical. The shells are then associated with two wounds to the head of Antony, the four of Paul, two to the head, a left shoulder and jaw and then fired two shots in the headlights. A cartridge case must remain for a shot went in vain. The reconstruction proposed here is not some claim to be the only possible, especially in the sequence of shots fired, it only proves to be reasonable in any case, any criticism would be welcome, provided that interest to someone do it, this does not seem very real.

The beginning of the aggression. The presence on the floor of the car of a condom containing semen tied on with an empty bag and a paper towel stained with semen indicate the consumption of a recent sexual intercourse, especially as the two young men had left the house about an hour first of being attacked. The report was likely to be consumed over the front seats reclined, and certainly not uncomfortable on the back seat of utilitarianism, a Fiat 127 Seat 147 is identical to a good memory. In the photo page 8A 22 gauge you can see the driver's side seat partially reclined in the passenger seat 3 photos completely lifted. The two boys were quite clearly preparing to leave, and, considering that Antonella Migliorini was found on the rear bench, one can only think that the boyfriend had done the courtesy to raise them to the back seat of his (notoriously tricky maneuver on small cars than once, with a knob at times hard to turn), while she, rannicchiatasi behind maneuvering, ended to put in place before returning to the front. E 'reasonable to assume that the interior light was on, as indeed he was spotted by a witness who passed the pitch minutes before the attack. The monster came out just as Paul was pulling on his back, left it in half, giving him the time before starting to shoot the start up and engage the reverse gear to escape. The boy did not, however, took the handbrake, or at least not completely, in fact, was found shot to two-thirds. When leaving the murderess was able to shoot the first 3 shots, shattering the driver's side window and hitting Paul is not serious in his left shoulder Antonella and twice in the head, killing her.

It can be assumed that the target was always the guy tried, and that she is on the line for two shots fruitless, being seated on the right side of the rear bench.

The displacement of the car. As the car was relegated the murderess moved by going back and firing shots 4 or 5, yet the first through the window hitting Paul on the left side of the jaw, as he turned to the right to see the road, the other to the medium that was gaining speed, however, missing the target. The car then ended with the rear wheels in the ditch on the other side of the road. While Paul tried to share but unable to engage the first for the difficulty of maneuvering the clutch without the support of the backrest, the murderess came # 6 firing the shot that left the middle ear through the windshield making it wear out on the seat. Apparently the victim was struck with the head turned to the right while trying to understand what was happening to his girl or the situation of the land.

The preparation for the cutting of the pubis. At this point the murderess had not yet lost hope of being able to enjoy the macabre excision of the pubis, and then first thought to turn off the lights stayed on, firing projectiles at 7:08 at the front and smashing kick those positions. It 'just this last act that demonstrates his willingness to continue with the cut despite the compromised situation, because if the knock out the lights could also be placed during the run-up to the car not to be dazzled, turn off the lights position had no other reasons than those of the darkened area to limit the danger that someone would stop.
When remove the girl from inside the car but noticed that the door was locked from the inside on his side. Then turned the other side to remove the keys from the dashboard through the window now no glass, turn off the interior light if it was still burning.

The arrival of the boys: While the monster was planned for the usual end, the two cars came with the four boys, so he had to hide in the dark around there, maybe even behind ' car at the bottom of the ditch if there was a dry place. Probably with an automatic gesture, put his keys in his pocket just taken. This was the moment when Paolo Mainardi was heard breathing down on the front seat. All participants then ran for help.

Moving Paul accepting the validity of conflicting evidence about the position of Paul Mainardi, we must assume its displacement during the time interval between the departure of four boys and the arrival of stretcher bearers. The poor have been shown to have a very strong fiber, remaining alive for several hours after the attack, in addition we suppose that the Monster, hidden near the car, had not yet fired the fourth shot, the more devastating. Then Paul, after having seen the arrival of the boys may have recovered a lucid moment dragging, facilitated by the back of his seat partially lowered, the rear bench to be close to his girlfriend while awaiting the relief. Unfortunately, the monster was hiding near the car, and, realizing that Paul was still alive and thinking of the danger of a witness who had seen him, put his hand inside the car through the broken window and hit him behind the left ear while it was turned to Antonio. The ejected cartridge case was found on the right rear pad, clearly bounced first on the left wall.

Escape. At this point, the monster could do was flee, and during the trip got rid of the keys that he had put in his pocket. Unfortunately you can not understand where these keys were found, perhaps rather far from the scene of the crime, and therefore their position could make us guess the area where the car was parked murderer.

seems unconnected to the crime scene somewhere around the discovery of an empty box of a sedative, the Norzetam, which some think might be served at the monster to overcome a panic attack. Considering that the effect comes after a half hour would be very strange if the murderess, committed to escape the imminent arrival of relief, had taken a tablet near the site of the murders. Probably someone had thrown out the window of her car passing in front of it.

How Toreset The Number Lock In Vip Suitcase

The Razor Filastò

Of all the murders attributed to the dual monster Florence in 1982 to Baccaiano is certainly the most difficult to interpret, not because his motives are always the same as for its dynamics. The fact that the murderess does not make a macabre ritual removal of the pubic area is widely considered a consequence of the pressure of events, and not a choice. But where there are many different ideas and the progress of omicidaria. I invite the reader, before continuing to read well on the Caliber 22 page dedicated , where beautiful pictures and excellent considerations (some of which made my own) can help you better understand what is being discussed.

The crime was the only one in which the means mechanism was moved from the starting point of aggression. When the monster began to shoot it, the car carrying Antonella Migliorini and Paolo Mainardi was parked in a lay-by adjacent to the current road in the town of New Virginia Montespertoli, as witnessed by three shells and fragments of glass left front broken, as rescuers found it on the opposite side of the road with the rear wheels finished in the kennel side, hopelessly blocked. According to the official story, the Monster had surprised the two lovers as they were composing after sex (as evidenced by a condom containing semen found on board), her on the back seat, him in the front seat. The boy was probably already aware of the danger before the murderess opened fire, igniting the engine and engaging the reverse gear to flee, given that the car was parked with its tail on the road. The show had started shooting continued even during the course of the car in reverse, until this had not stopped in that position already. Two more rounds to turn off the headlights and one with his hand inside the vehicle for delivering the coup de grace to the boy. The keys were taken out of context and thrown away. The arrival of two cars with four guys on board who seemed suspicious from the scene of an accident they flee the aggressor. The people who took part knew at once what had happened and called for help, which pulled out unconscious but alive Paolo Mainardi, while Antonella Migliorini there was nothing to do. Even though the boy died a few hours later without regaining consciousness.

This reconstruction was confirmed in principle by the statements of so-called repentant Giancarlo Lotti during the trial of Mario Vanni, and then challenged these hard defender of the Advocate, Nino Filastò, who wanted to demonstrate that the lot was lying. The complaint was based on the testimony of the rescuers intervened after the first alarm given by the boys rushed to the scene. If in fact the latter had claimed to have Paolo Mainardi seen sitting in the driver's seat, the stretcher bearers who rescued reported to have found it sitting next to his girlfriend on the back seat. Giving credence to this second testimony and it considered the other an error due to the heat of the moment, the lawyer suggested, therefore, a reconstruction of the completely different, you can read in his book "History of snacks infamous" to p. 381-388. According to the time of the attack Filastò Antoine and Paul are both on the back seat still willing to make love after a previous relationship. After being hit, the Monster would have started driving the car to move in a less conspicuous place in order can be made with greater confidence excision of the pubis, as the car was clearly visible from the busy street New Virginia. But during the maneuver in reverse out the murderess was disturbed by the reaction of the girl, writes Filastò still alive and , which fired the fatal blow while losing control of the car crash that ended well for the position in which was later found. After trying unsuccessfully to restart the monster would come out to shoot the latest hits to the lights stayed on and still with Paul Mainardi, then flee help arrives.

Unfortunately the reconstruction of the lawyer has many weaknesses that make it cumbersome and wholly implausible, making him forget his beloved principle of "Occam's Razor", which states that the simplest solution is always preferable. Actually it's not even the only case where this happens, we will see in future posts, so much so that one could speak of "Razor Filastò", a revised and corrected according to its criteria of the original. Let

still major weaknesses in the reconstruction of Filastò.

The position of both boys on the back seat can not find any justification. If they wanted to make love because they do not lower the front seat backrests, as everyone would have done? In fact the car was found with the back of the driver's seat almost all the way down (but not entirely), as you can see from the photo on page 8A of the Caliber 22. The back of the front seat passenger side was completely hand raised (photo 3, however, must be enlarged to understand it). This scenario describes well a time when the two boys were about to leave, as we shall see later.

Paolo Mainardi If at the time of the attack was in the back seat, because the bullets shattered the glass front window?

seems incomprehensible Filastò reconstruction of the position of some of the shells traced. It was found three on the space next to the fragments of broken glass (the driver), witnessing the beginning of the aggression. Why did the Monster would be limited to only fire three times now completely non-neutralizing its victims, as he had and would always do that? Two other shells were found just off the pitch by the roadside, perhaps one of the two still inside the lot but in any case with the three above. In the reconstruction Filastò not clear when they would be fired. The monster, after leaving the car stuck, he crossed the street to shoot from the opposite? Why?

The exit from the pitch back down in a busy street seems more the gesture of a person in panic rather than that of a murderess proved always cold in his actions. More logical would be to do some maneuvering to get out with the muzzle on.

The car was found with the reverse gear engaged and the parking brake partially engaged. If the monster had been driving was first lowered the handbrake, but understandably not maneuver carried out by Paolo Mainardi panic. Then attempting to refloat the machine logic would say that the driver would have to engage first. The vehicle was not in fact in a quagmire, where a back and forth could possibly do the job, but tilted dangerously to the brink of a ditch, therefore, any backward movement would have worsened the situation. The injured boy is understandable that there is not able to change gears.

The extensive blood stain on the driver's seat (Fig. 8A to Caliber page 22) does not seem to be justified by the flood that Filastò assumed to be released from the wounds of Paul Mainardi while being pulled out.

Finally, the testimony of the first speakers, that they realized that Paul was still alive hearing him breathe. How could they have confused about his position? If they were heard to breathe a few inches. On the other hand, even the testimony of the ambulance did not appear to be challenged, then there must be an explanation that the lawyer, in his anxiety to prove the lies of the lot, does not even take into consideration. We will attempt here, in the next post.

Do Antibiotics Help With Cervical Mucus

hypothesis "Carlo" A screening

Among the hypotheses that attempt to explain the mystery of the passage of the gun between the group that supposedly killed in the Monster Signa and there is a proposal by Mario Spezi in his "Hills of Blood". The journalist tells of a Belgian writer named Ethel who would come into possession of a copy of a complaint of theft at home by Salvatore Vinci. The theft would have occurred in June 1974, three months before the murder of Borgo San Lorenzo, the first of the Monster. Ethel is a fancy name, but the person is real, and should correspond to Magdalen NABBA, now deceased English writer who lived in Florence and wrote a book in English The Monster Of Florence that she did not want to be published in Italian.

Returning to the complaint of theft, it must be said that Salvatore Vinci, surveys conducted as part of Track Sarda and journalistic reconstructions is the same Spezi both Cecioni and Monastra in their book, it seemed somehow been the organizer of the crime of Signa, among other things, that procured the gun, free from a relative of Villacidro his home in Sardinia. In addition Stefano Mele, on the order made by the gun, after the first version where it said he threw it away near the scene of the crime, claims to have returned had they given to Salvatore Vinci.

The theft report was not shown what was stolen, in fact, a complaint of theft would seem that most of trespassing. The hypothesis of Ethel, who endorses Mario Spezi, what was in that theft would be reduced by the infamous Beretta 22-caliber cartridge that includes the box with the left after the murder of Signa. Who stole the gun would then become the dreaded Monster of Florence. For the moment let's forget that the character is listed as author of the theft and then future (very unlikely) serial killer, let's concentrate on the fact that enough water is already on its behalf. Who says that the gun was among the stolen items, especially among the things to steal?

It 'hard to believe that Salvatore Vinci took home for six years in a weapon that would have accused of a crime, even with the box of cartridges remaining, further evidence against him. More so that the character is described by Mario Spezi as a very shrewd. Not only that, Salvatore Vinci with his DECLARED implicitly told the Police: "If found the Beretta 22 gauge with which they were killed Barbara Locci and Antonio Lo Bianco tenetemela part because it is mine! .

Let us now turn to the person who allegedly stole the possible future show. In "Hills of Blood" is given a fancy name "Charles", who then also marked the whole situation, but there is nothing that reinvent the wheel, identifying him with Antonio Vinci, son of Salvatore and Barbarina Steri, fifteen in 1974. The boy would react to the trauma of the loss of his mother, perhaps, perhaps killed by her father committed suicide, putting to kill couples with the same gun Signa. This is quite clearly a case of romance, without any evidence. In "Hills of Blood" is looking for some way to strengthen it by invoking some sort of compatibility with the figure of Antonio Vinci known FBI profile, where U.S. experts had traced an identikit psychological monster, very coarse-grained to say the truth. There is no need here to comment on these parallels laughable leggerseli invite the interested reader to the book (p. 241), here I give just one example:

The Americans have made a murderess who usually try to get this type of in contact with the police groped for detecting or otherwise, to pilfer the news. Our guy did the informant of the police.

The coincidences are of this type, the reader may judge for themselves of their minimum thickness. Finally common sense is hard to see in a young man guilty of murder in the first 15 years and 26 last, moreover, described as beautiful and defiant, and not at all iposessuato, despite a formal annulment of marriage impotentia coeundi . The coincidence that from January 1975 to the end of 1980, then in the period in which the dual murders ceased, the character had lived in northern Italy does not prove anything, if anything, we would wonder why he was so fond of the area around Florence, where he enjoyed killing could have done elsewhere.

The very fact that the book ends with an interview with the supposed monster in which serious allegations are dealt with tarallucci and Sardinian myrtle, shows that this is a gimmick to give a sop the reader of the book is at the end without a fault, in which the protagonist must surely have given his consent in question. How can we believe in fact that Anthony Vinci has not exercised the thousand American lawyers willing to represent him for free for a fair share of damages that certainly could have asked for the serious and unsubstantiated accusation? It appears that the United States has circulated his picture with a lot of information: "Here's the Monster of Florence". A real trick, in fact.

South Park Streaming Iphone

nonexistent

Some of those who believe that whoever killed a Signa in 1968 was not the monster but the apples with accomplices solve the problem of handover gun in a radical way: just did not happen, then two different weapons were used. The assumption of course clashes with the results of ballistics, because the two shell casings recovered from the old file on the murder resulted Signa expelled from the same gun used in subsequent crimes. But according to proponents of the theory of different guns, the two shells were placed in the file by the same monster that replaced the old and came from an entirely different weapon with two of his. And this in order to send investigators out of the way that it will peg away for years trying to get away without a monster among the Sardinians from a spider hole, while the killer was killing Florentine undisturbed. In short, a real screening, to complete the monster who sent an anonymous note to the Carabinieri who invited them to go check that old crime.

The anonymous note sent in all probability the very after the murder of Baccaiano in 1982, but this of course does not mean that he also made the replacement of the cartridge cases, if in fact the Monster was a character totally alien to the clan of the Sardinians who had killed in 1968 and came into possession of the gun behind their backs, the result did not change, and in all probability this was the case. But let us see the weaknesses of the theory that would replace the Monster Signa cartridge cases in the file. First our

have been so fortunate to have available in the historical crimes just a double homicide occurred in the area around Florence consumed a few years before his 1974 and above all committed with a .22-caliber gun like the one he used for more ever found. Not only in the area around Florence but throughout Italy there would be to find another crime of that type. It would be enough already to make this place the hypothesis between romance fantasies.

If we accept the sheer luck that the Monster would have helped him to find just the crime, it remains unclear how he would do to access the old file. The first thing was to be a judge or something like that, having permission to enter the archive the Court of Assizes of Perugia, where the issue lay buried among thousands of others. And no one should have been aware of it, despite the probable controls. If such a scene can feel comfortable in a crime movie, in reality it is hard to accept.

Finally it can be assumed that the ballistics expert who had made the general Innocent Zuntini contained in the dossier were provided with photographs of the shells examined, the Monster would replace those too? It should also be considered that the general, while a senior in 1982 was still well and could intervene if the matter had been subject to manipulation. According Filastò (History of the infamous snacks, p. 113) even then was considered Zuntini as a probable model of the gun a Beretta 73/74 too old, worn and shabby, exactly what had turned out to experts who had dealt with the crimes later.

Finally, the two shells in the file there should have been, it was the sake of Zuntini to prevent their destruction, instead of sending them to the National Division Artillery process is completed, he appended them to the file (History of snacks infamous p.112). In short, the Monster would be lucky to find a similar crime committed with a gun to her like his own which never found and the file still contains the shells that normally would not have been there. A bit too real.

So the hypothesis replacement of cartridge cases from the Monster Signa is good to put aside the confusion in the story is already too much. Of course, remains the mystery of how did this gun change hands. In one of the next post will examine the hypothesis "Charles" by Mario Spezi.