I have already mentioned in the post "Who killed Barbara Locci" Pacciani improbable solution found in the investigation to explain the connection of the crime Signa with the next. The way chosen in the investigation of the Companions of snacks was totally different, equally unlikely and not supported by any but certainly more articulate and charming architecture: the qualities of novelist Michael Giuttari obviously made the difference. It was not called into question the matrix of Sardinia that first crime, but to explain the use of the same weapon in Vanni and those made subsequently by Pacciani you tried to connect to one of the two protagonists of the Sardinian slope, Francesco Vinci, also died and unable to counter, through which it would occur the transition. Let us see what were the main factors that allowed the investigator to make the astonishing hypothesis. Giancarlo Lotti
course was to provide the first and most important link, enriching, with the proven technique of gradual adjustment, the first version given by him about the murder of 1983 in Giogoli. In this case it is clear that the wily sorry he strove to meet the expectations of investigators, and thus maintain their status of protected witness, unless you wish to legitimately suspect the reverse link. Here is how he told the PG Daniele Propato during the appeal process:
On June 12, '96 he was asked whether he had heard that this murder was done because someone was in prison and had to go out and Lotti says "I have not heard of this." On 15 July, asking lots of talk with PM speaks of Vinci, which has seen him twice, once alone, with a beard, then saw him with the Vanni and the Vanni said that was the person who had to leave. In this circumstance confirmation hearing lots of Vinci.
And so, after denying a specific request to know anything about Francesco Vinci, Giancarlo Lotti spent a month said that the two German boys had been killed, had said Vanni, for " to a sorting out of prison , Francesco Vinci fact, since then in the company of the same Vanni twice in San Casciano. It is worth mentioning that at that time the subject was under the witness protection program, " a golden hen which occasionally go to ask the eggs, "wrote Francesco Ferri as in his" The case Pacciani. In fact, that the lot has involved the now-defunct Francesco Vinci, satisfying the expectations of those who questioned him as a suspect is a certainty. Why would it first claimed to know nothing and then, after a month, change your mind? In this case you can not rely on the usual grounds of inner struggle or attempt to diminish its responsibility, the fact does not in fact called into question, so if something really knew nothing would prevent him to report it immediately.
Michele Giuttari found, however, other witnesses ready to give manforte to support his hypothesis. One of these was John Calamosca, the character from which Francesco Vinci had taken refuge before his arrest as a suspected murderess and later suspected him. When questioned, he reported that Vinci had confided to him that the crime of 1968 would have made him and Stefano Mele, and immediately after the gun was sold to those responsible for subsequent offenses. Vinci would then blackmailed people which had given the weapon, and this would be done outside. The same story Calamosca confirmed it in a deposition that lasted two hours during the trial of the Companions of snacks. To fully assess the reliability of the witness is is worth mentioning that the same occasion was also reported Calamosca confidences made to him by Pacciani common during the detention, under which he would have had a child by Miranda Bugli, the girlfriend of 1951, but did not live with him. The reaction of the farmer was exemplary
But you put the numbers in the lottery, here are all silly as a mental hospital with the Miranda I love you but then you let the fact that grabbed a more. The I had to marry, but there was the process, We have already said all of this. But as a son, had told her the true process .
And when should have been born this unknown son of Pacciani? The woman had been (wrongly) convicted along with former boyfriend as his accomplice, and out of prison was then married in 1957, while he remained there until 1964. On the other hand a story like that would certainly not have remained secret, it was just a pure invention. In a subsequent interview with the television program "Who has seen" Calamosca said then that he thought Vanni and Pacciani were innocent and that the real monster is going to kill Francesco Vinci's lover Milva Malatesta. The desire of the subject of leadership was clearly very strong.
Michele Giuttari also found another character of the prisons in the world willing to provide supporting evidence for links to the Sardinian slope, of which there is no trace statements in "The monster", but that in the previous " Companions of blood" would take many pages . It was Joseph Sgangarella, sentenced to life imprisonment for raping and murdering a girl of eight, he is in prison acquaintance of Pietro Pacciani both Francesco Vinci, to whom he had gathered some confidence. The investigator questioned him coming so I know that Win, Vanni and Pacciani have attended along a deserted farmhouse in the countryside of San Casciano for " do tarot cards and predict the future , "and that the Vinci was paying for friends." The despicable individual told many other lies, it only takes one for all, Pacciani in his cell, " ... celebrating Mass on Sunday morning on his own according to the rite of black magic ... he used candles and satanic images ... on issues and peel of cheese. " Of course, no other inmate confirmed the fact, even Aldo Bochicchio, also questioned him for Giuttari, who had shared the cell with Pacciani for a couple of months.
It 's time to summarize the entire reconstruction Michele Giuttari had in mind, as can be deduced from his books, or at least believed to have understood how the writer. With it would take two birds with one stone: to explain the passage of the gun by the Sardinians to fellow snacks and make more concrete the presence of the dome of the commissioners, thereby entering fully into the esoteric track. But let's degrees.
As suggested, it seems, by Gabriella Carlizzi, at the dawn of the whole affair the sect who later commissioned the crimes of the monster needed a gun 'dirty', ie that he had already killed, in order to obtain more energy from the satanic fetishes torn future female victims. He was then asked for help to the famous magician I guess, obviously He also linked to the sect, whose house was the home of magical rituals and black masses. The friendly atmosphere was attended by the Companions of snacks and also by Francesco Vinci, Sardinian which would remain in his gun after the murder of Signa, of which he was responsible along with Stefano Mele. The self-styled magician then asked to Win the infamous Francesco Beretta, date and Vanni Pacciani then recruited to commit the crimes as requested by the heads of the sect. When Francesco Vinci
years after he was accused and arrested for the crimes of the monster in the Sardinian slope, threatened to sue those who had given the gun, asking in exchange for his silence to be cleared through a new crime. As we all know was promptly answered by the Companions of snacks with the killing of two German Giogoli poor children in 1983. But the turbulent character had not yet finished creating problems, crimes terminated because of the revelations began to threaten again, he wanted money, and then August 7, 1993, on behalf of the mysterious sect, was tortured, mutilated, killed and then burned together with the 'friend Angelo Vargas. A few days later was also killed his lover, Milva Malatesta, along with three years of son Mirko.
Here ends the romantic reconstruction work of Michele Giuttari lively imagination, that it is hard to criticize all the wires seem to perfection. Too bad it lacks any feedback. Only some small detail I'd like to know more. The first: the sect had bought the gun from Salvatore Vinci to perform the killings, but was a photocopy of what he would have been a Signa, so he bought the idea? The second: the gun changed hands by 1974, when he was made the first double murder at the hands of officers of the sect, but for the first collection of fetishes had to wait another seven years. Why? The third: the seven years he was entrusted to a grotesque band of outcasts for the crimes of the couples, however, to eliminate Francesco Vinci and the lover had used the real experts who have tortured, incaprettarono, burned, simulated an accident. Why this double behavior? The principals had finally learned that everyone should do their job?
The reader can judge for themselves once again as above, personally I can hardly believe that the professionals within the judiciary may even have considered such a situation as possible. The attempt by Michele Giuttari to connect the track with Fellow Sarda snacks in order to solve the eternal riddle of the gun, is very awkward at the end, resting only on late declarations Giancarlo Lotti without the minimum feedback and testimonials Individuals interested in a misunderstanding probably gain of some kind. The rest is just pure fantasy, a daring rebuilding far-fetched in the context of the appalling track Esoteric.
0 comments:
Post a Comment