after spending the last after investigation, I would now add a further element in the shape of a murderess who could emerge slowly from the hood in the smoke which has been hidden from those same surveys tragically wrong. Start with a strong statement:
the Monster of Florence was not a real sex maniac, but an impersonator who tried the show
There are many factors that lead to this conclusion, in the post "Why a breast," it had already been exposed one. Today we look at another, trying to answer the question, as he remembered to remove the pubic hair? On pages
429-430 of his "History of snacks infamous" Nino Filastò reports the observations of an anonymous doctor who noted strong similarities between Frank Zito, star of the film William Lustig Maniac, and the Monster of Florence. In fact in the film are secluded killed two couples, one in the car in a sequence highly spectacular and exciting, at least for fans of the genre. The film, however, is 1980, while the monster had already killed in 1974, if anything, his inspiration had come from the crime of Signa, which also held the gun. There are other elements, however, that they suspect some influence of the film on the minds of our serial-killer, we must not forget was considered by many experts as the Anglo-Saxon extraction, then the fact would be well justified. Imagine that the monster could be a consumer of movies sadistic sexual background is not difficult, considering the kind of luck in the '70s and '80s, I remember the legendary "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" of 1974, perhaps as a parent, and then "That motel near the swamp," "The Hills Have Eyes," "Halloween," "Amityville Horror, The Shining, Friday the 13th, and others.
Coming Maniac , look at the poster is coming soon in mind what might have been the biggest influence on Monster. Frank Zito cut the scalp of its female victims, and then put it as a kind of wig mannequins with whom voiced their problems, how can we fail to cut pubic fleece by the Monster? In fact it was only what interested him, not taking away the true sexual organs.
If indeed, as seems quite likely, our murderess had taken the idea of \u200b\u200bremoving the pubic level reworking in his own way what happened in Maniac, it becomes much more plausible to consider that in fact there was only one behind the gesture looking spectacular and certainly not the fulfillment of a sexual need. But we will see better in future posts. About
Maniac there is only one element to clarify the time at which the film was planned in Italy, and then seen by the murderer. The first crime with excision of the pubis was to Scandicci of June 6, 1981, while Maniac seems to be released some time later, on August 30 was definitely planning to Supercinema of Florence. In spring, however, it was much publicized by the trailer that was first broadcast on TV obsessively private, and the delay in programming was due to economic problems of the Italian distributor. Personally I do not remember him, because at that time I had other things to think about, but it seems that the film was much talked about, it is to be seen to believe his remarkable aggressive charge.
The trailer was part of a scene cut in the scalp, the poster on that particular beat and even the Italian subtitle " Hunting for scalps on the streets of New York " was always there.
Monster in short, even without having seen the film, must have in mind the operation of cutting hair, and then have developed a particular interpretation.
When he saw the film, it is to believe to receive other incentives, to emulate the publicity in the media business by Frank Zito seems quite plausible. There is also the physical structure character actor Joe Spinell that could constitute a further element of identification, but that's another story. As it reminds us Filastò Nino, programming at the National Film Theatre in Florence 20 to 22 October 1981, when the crime occurred just Calenzano 22, in an unusual autumn day, certainly gives food for thought.
0 comments:
Post a Comment