Transferring Pokemon Between Games

PEDEMONTANA: MAYOR SAYS THERE BIASSONO

roundabout, roundabouts do not. This is the problem . It seems that they are mainly for the Mayor Gate Macherio forced, as already announced some time ago, to back down at his own initiative after having macheriese against all opposition, much of his majority (as confirmed more Sometimes, even the last City Council), the most of his nationality and even more the mayor of the neighboring Biassono, Piero Malegori , met by our own newspaper for its assessment of the foothills and the impact of the route in both countries.

Porta said he was committed to restoring the subway and the annulment of his "invention" or roundabouts, played as a bargaining chip. But a specific question about the dropping of the round, Malegori raises the doubt. Sure you will succeed?

P: How was it handled the issue in Biassono foothills to citizenship, were made public assemblies and municipal councils are open?

S: We had a public meeting when the project was presented by foothills, where he also saw Biassono as Macherio penalized.

P: How many dispossessed Biassonesi?

S: The dispossessed who will be deprived of the house are a total Biassono 16 families of which 5 have clearly decided to remain on our territory.

P: Those who have established Biassono to stay, were placed on a common or private? In what has been sold per square meter in the home and costs have already attached the infrastructure costs or be at the expense of families?

S: The land where the dispossessed were included, Hall was half and half private. The area has been converted from a standard building ground, agreeing on the figure of 130 € per meter. Families can build their own houses of equal size to those to be demolished, with the possibility of increasing the sizes to legal norms. To prevent speculation, the constraints have been placed by the municipality. The infrastructure costs will be borne by the owner by force, because otherwise I'd go as mayor against the law. I believe that families have received considerable compensation from foothills and that somehow, they were also calculated the infrastructure costs. Many people, who were also rightly concerned about, now and the end of their labor, they feel more relieved and happy.

P: On the final draft of the foothills in the territory of Macherio there are two more roundabouts on a street queen Margaret, the second after two supermarkets. In your opinion, could lead to damage even on the territory of Biassono?

S. The City of Macherio me really tired. Before you put the round after he decided to remove them. I think the roundabout at Queen Margaret is also important for Macheriesi that should not goose rides to get on the highway.

P: Does that Macherio already overly penalized as a territory, with a path that cuts the country in its totality, more with a wriggling? If it were the mayor would like to Macherio traffic in and out?

S: It does not seem right that the problem should be the traffic on our country. We Biassono we had to solve the problem of the track that first fell into the high end of the territory now in final draft, we found a highway closer to the country.

P: His fear with regard to traffic and a possible removal of roundabouts at Macherio, is due to the fact that the SP6bis if not carried out for lack of money as the 'Councillor of Regione Lombardia Cattaneo said, would risk an increase in traffic through the streets of our own country?

S: There is enough money to fund the banks. However, it's all about ratings, because I felt Magnano and he confirmed that the money is there. I still think that the new provincial road is essential for Biassono as Macherio and allow our country to move traffic to the outside, giving us the opportunity to develop the new area. I hope that the town of Albi and Carate return on their footsteps, because I do not understand how we can bring together the car yet on the old road

P: Do you think that the mayor can still take off the door the two roundabouts in the final draft the final design?

S: Do not let me respond. I do not want polemics.

P: Macherio should go their own way, keeping the round that made the meeting with the mayors of the district, without looking at the opposition and the 700 signatures of citizens?

S: Those are just trifles.

P: You may be afraid Door, in making certain decisions because they would lose the next election, while you have a hard core?

From the back room ... it can be.

Alessandro Casiraghi

Best Surfboard Tie Down

Good postal Pacciani

As you know, after the surprising discovery, through the confessions Giancarlo Lotti, so that the mysterious monster of Florence was in reality a gang of silly country led by Pietro Pacciani, it was necessary to find a credible motive for the brutal murders, because they could no longer speak of sexual motivations. Groups of people were at the raping and then killing to eliminate witnesses to the rapes, but realized that an alliance of maniacs interested in specific crimes such as those perpetrated at the expense of couples killed around Florence was quite impossible. The same investigators, willing to build very unlikely scenarios to justify their theories, do not feel to go on the road of sexual depravity, which were kept only as an attitude of subjects to commit a crime, not as a real motivation.

was needed more, inexhaustible inventiveness of Michael Giuttari soon found the solution: kill the band for money, the sad bits of skin and flesh torn from poor female victims were sold to phantom customers.

course Giancarlo Lotti, endowed with incredible sensitivity to the expectations of the investigators, did not hesitate to lend its help, and then, after saying, in the interrogation of 11 March 1996

I want to clarify that Mario also told me that the parts of the woman whom he had excised Peter had brought them home to hide in the garage by putting them in a bundle. Mario told me that he wanted them Pacciani daughters to eat but do not know if it actually did.

in his letter sgrammaticatissima spontaneous November of that year he wrote:

Where you give these things of women. The sinus vagina or cunt Mario volio know who dates doctor who served Pietro Pacciani. We paid in cash . But no one wanted me to say which made it to the vagina and if you do things because mostrose.

Magically, after eight months of inner torment, when he had to start the new track Esoteric unlikely to be the sad bits of food for their daughters turned into Pacciani (!!!!!!!) equally unlikely objects of commerce. So there was a doctor who paid in money interested in purchasing the fetishes, which soon became stars of magic rites, satanic ceremonies, initiations, and so on.

Michele Giuttari, yes, but also detective novelist, tried to find evidence of what was emerging, so here's his research on the heritage of Pacciani, in his opinion is not explained by gains to the extent of which he was a farmer.

It was 157 million pounds, a figure which were highly significant, and three houses, but it is good to know, were not houses, small apartments, but restored by Pacciani also arranged with the same material does not quite know where he picked up. It should also be borne in mind that the subject was stingy in abnormally, going as far as dog food to give to their daughters, by all accounts was one thousand works (in black), and then, because the type, as if surprised he had rounded its revenue illegal activity with some small rogue?

But is the correlation between dates and dates of the crimes of the movements of money that the thesis of Michael Giuttari is more water. Just read the chapters he devotes to the subject in her two books to be convinced ( Companions of blood , p.. 234-237, p. The monster . 238-241). We are listed either to buy houses, cars, bills and payments on postal savings accounts in the period 1979-1987 that at a superficial examination also shows links with the possible sale of fetishes, which eventually were only four, while the Pacciani from financial transactions are much more: it may pay in installments? Or you give the peasant cunning behavior with which would split its payments by providing that a decade after a detective was going to make him the fleas?

start with the purchase of a house on September 30, 1979 for 26 million pounds in cash. The investigator convinces us that Pacciani could not have saved that money from his modest income, but the first excision took place two years later, then? This just proves that the "worker agricultural land" as he called himself, earning money in other ways, probably not very lawful.

On 18 June 1981, after 12 days from the first excision, Pacciani had bought the postal savings, Giuttari does not say to what value, but the subsequent purchase was March 12, 1982, excision of October 22, 1981 had not yielded anything then? Or had been paid with 5 months of delay, unlike the earlier settled now?

But we continue, as are three other operations during the year '82, April 26, August 10 and October 2, plus the purchase of the famous white Ford Fiesta in December. Giuttari reminds us that June 19 was another double murder took place, but you forget to write that had not been taken any fetish. Pacciani was paid anyway? And because so many operations before and after the crime?

On July 9, 1983 a payment of more money, without selling fetish, September 10, 1983 and another, this time on the day after the killing of two German boys in Giogoli. Even then there were no fetishes sold, it was in fact two men. And even if the double murder had been committed only to really "risen one from prison, and then also paid, it seems really strange that Pacciani the next morning, Saturday, perhaps without even taking a shower, run in Mail to buy the good, the loot he had collected the same evening of the murders?

On June 30, 1984 we buy another house for 35 million pounds in cash. It was an advance for the following fetish, I remember it was only available after July 29, the day of death of the poor Pia Rontini?

Giuttari for movements after only says that there were a number of postal savings to buy a total of 57 million lire in the period between November 15, 1985 and May 26, 1987, then completed crimes. But of course it's easy to find a justification, just a bit 'of invention: the second one could treat the investigator or a balance for work already carried out, clearly divided into many transactions from the cunning peasant, or of the proceeds of the blackmail to the principals, which However, there is the slightest evidence, because we know that these principals have remained only on paper. It 'obvious that there is no limit to human imagination, at this rate you can imagine all sin that we are not in the plot of a novel, so every assertion tests are necessary.

I hope that the reader an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat you've been doing is illogical to believe that Pacciani had reached its good disposable income with the sale of four levels and two breasts, pubic claims, they also completely useless as fetishes, why not store even in formalin. Even

Mario Vanni was made an analysis of assets, 146 million saved in a lifetime, bearing in mind that he had no children (a daughter died in infancy) and did not even have a car. And even here there are movements not explained by the supposed sale of fetishes, like 19 million of bonds purchased in 1984 before the murder of Vicchio after three years from the last operation was successful. They were an advance to the next chore ?

Moreover, even the PG Daniele Propato found nothing convincing in these allegations.

Monsters With Coke Rewards

ABSTRACTIONS FLORIA GIAMPIETRO paintings - sculptures ELLI CARLO

Exhibition Hall - Court of Cagnat

Via Roma, 38 - Macherio, MB

from March 19 to April 3, 2011

Schedule: Thursday , 16.30 to 18.30 Friday and Saturday and Sunday from 0.30 to 19 10-12/16.

Admission free.

Opening: Saturday, March 19, 18:00

Presentation Luigi Consonni

editor: Luigi Consonni

sponsored by: City of Macherio, AIDO Macherio

Information - Reservations visits schools, groups

tel. 320.5788799 istruzione@comunemacherio.mb.it 039.20756.204

Two artists on display: Floria Giampietro, painter, and Carlo Elli, a sculptor. Present their abstractions from contemporary modes of expression through two different but complementary.

Floria born in Vicenza in 1948, uses the chromaticity and the decomposition of a two-dimensional, on canvas or board, to tell its vision of "dream" with fragments of landscapes or figures with compositional harmony, chromaticity and style, revising it in abstract compositions.

Elli was born in Desio in 1941, elaborates his emotions through the development and research of three-dimensional sculpture. The His creativity goes beyond the obligation illustrations: it is full of ideas expressionist, pop, not to say surreal, although they rely on a classical conception of figuration.

Floria exhibited fifteen paintings on wood . abstract compositions that simultaneously recorded fragments of the real and informal. His figures and landscapes that suggest self-reflection as if we looked at many facets of the same subject in directly and simultaneously reflected in large bay windows. Everything mixed in, sometimes romantic at times energetic play of light. A very appreciated by the numerous juries in several years of work have often rewarded, always receiving great critical acclaim. What is most amazing is that Floria began painting at the age of 25 years on his own and has never attended academies. Simple and good-looking character has acquired the rudiments of painting through the advice of friends and painters smooth his path led him to these excellent results.

Elli in the exhibition, ten medium-sized sculptures , choices between the different techniques practiced by him: from clay to bronze, from the concrete to the resins. Sculptures show that well this way of creating a bit 'eclectic and naive.

is noted for example in the head in yellow clay, expressiveness, search features, which goes beyond the real eyes a bit 'Egyptians, the movement of hair, staring into space and at once thoughtful, all the elements that make deformed image that is not deformed. Even more visionary is black head with an eye to the sky, his hair flutter as horizontal supported by the wind, with braids and shapes that echo the shape of the tentacles of an octopus.

In Elli are therefore an abstraction of reality, however figurative, through plasticity is unrelated to the material research of full and empty, typical of the sculpture, but to a creative result of an eclectic way externalize the state of mind, which manifests itself at that precise moment, the act of giving, and define a volume.

Luigi Consonni

Can I Wax Over Jock Itch

Maniac

after spending the last after investigation, I would now add a further element in the shape of a murderess who could emerge slowly from the hood in the smoke which has been hidden from those same surveys tragically wrong. Start with a strong statement:

the Monster of Florence was not a real sex maniac, but an impersonator who tried the show

There are many factors that lead to this conclusion, in the post "Why a breast," it had already been exposed one. Today we look at another, trying to answer the question, as he remembered to remove the pubic hair? On pages

429-430 of his "History of snacks infamous" Nino Filastò reports the observations of an anonymous doctor who noted strong similarities between Frank Zito, star of the film William Lustig Maniac, and the Monster of Florence. In fact in the film are secluded killed two couples, one in the car in a sequence highly spectacular and exciting, at least for fans of the genre. The film, however, is 1980, while the monster had already killed in 1974, if anything, his inspiration had come from the crime of Signa, which also held the gun. There are other elements, however, that they suspect some influence of the film on the minds of our serial-killer, we must not forget was considered by many experts as the Anglo-Saxon extraction, then the fact would be well justified. Imagine that the monster could be a consumer of movies sadistic sexual background is not difficult, considering the kind of luck in the '70s and '80s, I remember the legendary "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" of 1974, perhaps as a parent, and then "That motel near the swamp," "The Hills Have Eyes," "Halloween," "Amityville Horror, The Shining, Friday the 13th, and others.

Coming Maniac , look at the poster is coming soon in mind what might have been the biggest influence on Monster. Frank Zito cut the scalp of its female victims, and then put it as a kind of wig mannequins with whom voiced their problems, how can we fail to cut pubic fleece by the Monster? In fact it was only what interested him, not taking away the true sexual organs.

If indeed, as seems quite likely, our murderess had taken the idea of \u200b\u200bremoving the pubic level reworking in his own way what happened in Maniac, it becomes much more plausible to consider that in fact there was only one behind the gesture looking spectacular and certainly not the fulfillment of a sexual need. But we will see better in future posts. About

Maniac there is only one element to clarify the time at which the film was planned in Italy, and then seen by the murderer. The first crime with excision of the pubis was to Scandicci of June 6, 1981, while Maniac seems to be released some time later, on August 30 was definitely planning to Supercinema of Florence. In spring, however, it was much publicized by the trailer that was first broadcast on TV obsessively private, and the delay in programming was due to economic problems of the Italian distributor. Personally I do not remember him, because at that time I had other things to think about, but it seems that the film was much talked about, it is to be seen to believe his remarkable aggressive charge.

The trailer was part of a scene cut in the scalp, the poster on that particular beat and even the Italian subtitle " Hunting for scalps on the streets of New York " was always there.

Monster in short, even without having seen the film, must have in mind the operation of cutting hair, and then have developed a particular interpretation.

When he saw the film, it is to believe to receive other incentives, to emulate the publicity in the media business by Frank Zito seems quite plausible. There is also the physical structure character actor Joe Spinell that could constitute a further element of identification, but that's another story. As it reminds us Filastò Nino, programming at the National Film Theatre in Florence 20 to 22 October 1981, when the crime occurred just Calenzano 22, in an unusual autumn day, certainly gives food for thought.

Old Webcam Installations

The towel Giuttari

Michele Giuttari When he wrote his second book on the affair, "The Monster", the investigations in the Esoteric track had been shown all over their failure. It was in 2005, the fanciful theories about wizards and witches, secret sects and false leads had proved all bubbles burst by now, and he was finally out of what remained of the investigation, in addition or in the process of being investigated for abuse of office.

Giuttari In the final pages of the book tries to leave the reader with the feeling that his work was interrupted just as had happened on something big, which could be sensational developments.

We see what it is.

leafing through the old papers in a desperate search for something that could help give new life to stagnant investigations, the investigator had happened on the news of the existence of a report ordered up a tissue found by the curious on the pitch via Scopeti few days after the crime, though rather far from the crime scene, "a discovery unimaginable," according to his words (p.334). The tissue was stained with blood, a hair attached, and roll a couple of small rubber gloves. In the binder the findings were, but not the expertise. Taken from the frenzy to get their hands on evidence that his colleagues had failed and that he thought they could hide something big, racing Giuttari sent an aide to the Institute of Forensic Medicine where the survey was carried out immediately in order to have a copy. Although the offices were closed, nearly midnight his collaborator rang at his home in triumph with the expertise in hand. All this story is on pages 335-344 of "The Monster", but this is clearly fictional literature. He wrote the attorney Adriani Vieri in his magnificent document reported here several times:

... It is not clear how that expertise could not bear ... to the proceedings (so that it would be necessary to send an officer judicial police to get it in the late evening at the Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Florence), when the computer in question must have always found in the folders of the investigation Pacciani against Peter. Not for nothing has been able to trace the writer's expertise Cagli quite simply among the papers of the College that preceded it, kept together with all other expert witnesses in that proceeding.

The survey reported the blood group of the traces of blood on the handkerchief, the very popular B, that neither of the Companions of the victims or had snacks. Even small gloves could not have been worn by Pacciani and others. In addition, a hair belonging to a subject of group B was found in the hands of the prostitute frequented by Clelia Cuscito Mario Vanni and killed in Florence by the "maniac of prostitutes" in 1983. It also adds that Giancarlo Lotti had spoken of a mysterious car with two people having the street on the evening of the murder of two French. These ingredients is more than enough to imagine the usual investigator mysterious scenes that had become its own specialty, " For me there can be no doubt that these objects had to do with the crime ."

But what probative value can be attributed to that tissue soaked in blood?

" Two miles of cars in line for a picnic in the forest of death " This is the subtitle of an article in "The Nation" on 16 September 1985. The macabre curiosity of people brought hundreds of people on the scene the next few days, imagine that some of them may have cut snooping around and that someone (surely a woman, given the extent of gloves) to have her medicated is not difficult. Then possible that the specimens had escaped the researches of the Scientific Police, who at that time had finally tried to do the work that had to be done?

In his book, the detective leaves us with the curiosity to know the result of the DNA, which at the time not exist and that instead he had ordered, and that course appeared to his superiors did not want. An examination was then carried out, we hear what he says Vieri Adriani:

In short, counsel for the prosecutor established that the bloodstains "are attributable to a male whose profile geographical origin estimated by genetic means 'Eastern Europe'. The profile of the Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA have shown that 'haplotypes' found in the Europe of' East, in particular between the Bulgarian and Turkish populations.

Hence that is realized the possibility of an international branch of the sect who was behind the terrible crimes of the monster, or maybe it was just a curious stranger?

The reader may judge for himself.

Knee Pain And Locking Up

investigator or novelist?

I have already mentioned in the post "Who killed Barbara Locci" Pacciani improbable solution found in the investigation to explain the connection of the crime Signa with the next. The way chosen in the investigation of the Companions of snacks was totally different, equally unlikely and not supported by any but certainly more articulate and charming architecture: the qualities of novelist Michael Giuttari obviously made the difference. It was not called into question the matrix of Sardinia that first crime, but to explain the use of the same weapon in Vanni and those made subsequently by Pacciani you tried to connect to one of the two protagonists of the Sardinian slope, Francesco Vinci, also died and unable to counter, through which it would occur the transition. Let us see what were the main factors that allowed the investigator to make the astonishing hypothesis. Giancarlo Lotti

course was to provide the first and most important link, enriching, with the proven technique of gradual adjustment, the first version given by him about the murder of 1983 in Giogoli. In this case it is clear that the wily sorry he strove to meet the expectations of investigators, and thus maintain their status of protected witness, unless you wish to legitimately suspect the reverse link. Here is how he told the PG Daniele Propato during the appeal process:

On June 12, '96 he was asked whether he had heard that this murder was done because someone was in prison and had to go out and Lotti says "I have not heard of this." On 15 July, asking lots of talk with PM speaks of Vinci, which has seen him twice, once alone, with a beard, then saw him with the Vanni and the Vanni said that was the person who had to leave. In this circumstance confirmation hearing lots of Vinci.

And so, after denying a specific request to know anything about Francesco Vinci, Giancarlo Lotti spent a month said that the two German boys had been killed, had said Vanni, for " to a sorting out of prison , Francesco Vinci fact, since then in the company of the same Vanni twice in San Casciano. It is worth mentioning that at that time the subject was under the witness protection program, " a golden hen which occasionally go to ask the eggs, "wrote Francesco Ferri as in his" The case Pacciani. In fact, that the lot has involved the now-defunct Francesco Vinci, satisfying the expectations of those who questioned him as a suspect is a certainty. Why would it first claimed to know nothing and then, after a month, change your mind? In this case you can not rely on the usual grounds of inner struggle or attempt to diminish its responsibility, the fact does not in fact called into question, so if something really knew nothing would prevent him to report it immediately.

Michele Giuttari found, however, other witnesses ready to give manforte to support his hypothesis. One of these was John Calamosca, the character from which Francesco Vinci had taken refuge before his arrest as a suspected murderess and later suspected him. When questioned, he reported that Vinci had confided to him that the crime of 1968 would have made him and Stefano Mele, and immediately after the gun was sold to those responsible for subsequent offenses. Vinci would then blackmailed people which had given the weapon, and this would be done outside. The same story Calamosca confirmed it in a deposition that lasted two hours during the trial of the Companions of snacks. To fully assess the reliability of the witness is is worth mentioning that the same occasion was also reported Calamosca confidences made to him by Pacciani common during the detention, under which he would have had a child by Miranda Bugli, the girlfriend of 1951, but did not live with him. The reaction of the farmer was exemplary

But you put the numbers in the lottery, here are all silly as a mental hospital with the Miranda I love you but then you let the fact that grabbed a more. The I had to marry, but there was the process, We have already said all of this. But as a son, had told her the true process .

And when should have been born this unknown son of Pacciani? The woman had been (wrongly) convicted along with former boyfriend as his accomplice, and out of prison was then married in 1957, while he remained there until 1964. On the other hand a story like that would certainly not have remained secret, it was just a pure invention. In a subsequent interview with the television program "Who has seen" Calamosca said then that he thought Vanni and Pacciani were innocent and that the real monster is going to kill Francesco Vinci's lover Milva Malatesta. The desire of the subject of leadership was clearly very strong.

Michele Giuttari also found another character of the prisons in the world willing to provide supporting evidence for links to the Sardinian slope, of which there is no trace statements in "The monster", but that in the previous " Companions of blood" would take many pages . It was Joseph Sgangarella, sentenced to life imprisonment for raping and murdering a girl of eight, he is in prison acquaintance of Pietro Pacciani both Francesco Vinci, to whom he had gathered some confidence. The investigator questioned him coming so I know that Win, Vanni and Pacciani have attended along a deserted farmhouse in the countryside of San Casciano for " do tarot cards and predict the future , "and that the Vinci was paying for friends." The despicable individual told many other lies, it only takes one for all, Pacciani in his cell, " ... celebrating Mass on Sunday morning on his own according to the rite of black magic ... he used candles and satanic images ... on issues and peel of cheese. " Of course, no other inmate confirmed the fact, even Aldo Bochicchio, also questioned him for Giuttari, who had shared the cell with Pacciani for a couple of months.

It 's time to summarize the entire reconstruction Michele Giuttari had in mind, as can be deduced from his books, or at least believed to have understood how the writer. With it would take two birds with one stone: to explain the passage of the gun by the Sardinians to fellow snacks and make more concrete the presence of the dome of the commissioners, thereby entering fully into the esoteric track. But let's degrees.

As suggested, it seems, by Gabriella Carlizzi, at the dawn of the whole affair the sect who later commissioned the crimes of the monster needed a gun 'dirty', ie that he had already killed, in order to obtain more energy from the satanic fetishes torn future female victims. He was then asked for help to the famous magician I guess, obviously He also linked to the sect, whose house was the home of magical rituals and black masses. The friendly atmosphere was attended by the Companions of snacks and also by Francesco Vinci, Sardinian which would remain in his gun after the murder of Signa, of which he was responsible along with Stefano Mele. The self-styled magician then asked to Win the infamous Francesco Beretta, date and Vanni Pacciani then recruited to commit the crimes as requested by the heads of the sect. When Francesco Vinci

years after he was accused and arrested for the crimes of the monster in the Sardinian slope, threatened to sue those who had given the gun, asking in exchange for his silence to be cleared through a new crime. As we all know was promptly answered by the Companions of snacks with the killing of two German Giogoli poor children in 1983. But the turbulent character had not yet finished creating problems, crimes terminated because of the revelations began to threaten again, he wanted money, and then August 7, 1993, on behalf of the mysterious sect, was tortured, mutilated, killed and then burned together with the 'friend Angelo Vargas. A few days later was also killed his lover, Milva Malatesta, along with three years of son Mirko.

Here ends the romantic reconstruction work of Michele Giuttari lively imagination, that it is hard to criticize all the wires seem to perfection. Too bad it lacks any feedback. Only some small detail I'd like to know more. The first: the sect had bought the gun from Salvatore Vinci to perform the killings, but was a photocopy of what he would have been a Signa, so he bought the idea? The second: the gun changed hands by 1974, when he was made the first double murder at the hands of officers of the sect, but for the first collection of fetishes had to wait another seven years. Why? The third: the seven years he was entrusted to a grotesque band of outcasts for the crimes of the couples, however, to eliminate Francesco Vinci and the lover had used the real experts who have tortured, incaprettarono, burned, simulated an accident. Why this double behavior? The principals had finally learned that everyone should do their job?

The reader can judge for themselves once again as above, personally I can hardly believe that the professionals within the judiciary may even have considered such a situation as possible. The attempt by Michele Giuttari to connect the track with Fellow Sarda snacks in order to solve the eternal riddle of the gun, is very awkward at the end, resting only on late declarations Giancarlo Lotti without the minimum feedback and testimonials Individuals interested in a misunderstanding probably gain of some kind. The rest is just pure fantasy, a daring rebuilding far-fetched in the context of the appalling track Esoteric.

Best Puzzle Game 2009

Screening

How Peter came to suspect Pacciani? Perhaps it is not quite known, but appears to have been a computer to suggest the name to investigators. Perugini When Roger took over in 1986 with Sandro Federico head of the SAM (Anti Monster Squad), not had nothing to work with, if not a mountain of anonymous letters. To integrate the unreliability of the information available, thought it well to benefit from new techniques. The SAM was supplied with a PC where the data had been included thousands who had come in contact with the surveys of Monster, for anonymous reporting, searches or other controls. From this database was extracted a list of 82 names from that street crime in Scopeti then had been somewhat alarmed by the attentions of law enforcement, and this may be deterred from killing again. Pacciani, by virtue of an anonymous letter received in 1985 and the subsequent search that could have worried, was among 82 individuals selected.

A second list was provided by the Data Processing Centre of the Ministry of Justice. He asked the technicians to query their database using a set of selection conditions (or filters) that ultimately will yield a list of 26 names of individuals highly suspected, among them was still that of Peter Pacciani, which was the only one present in both lists. But the result of work done by the Ministry of the computer could not be left to chance. Here's why, trying to rebuild the main conditions for the selection of what can be deduced from what he can read books that deal with, not always agree with each other.

First they took the examination in males born or living in Tuscany who had to do with justice, in short, undermined, since the database contained only available to their names. So if the monster had never been arrested, everything was falling miserably from the outset.

To narrow the search were filtered only those who were aged between 30 and 60 years on the last murder in 1985. It 'obvious that the breadth of the range would change the number of persons selected, and the fact that the extreme upper , 60, matched his age of Pacciani could suspect that he had been chosen for the purpose of including himself in the list, an a posteriori justification, in other words. Wanting to be even more evil, you might notice that the subject was born January 7, 1925, so the 8 September 1985 had already exceeded 60 years 8 months. However, considering the dynamics of the murder of Scopeti street where the boy was chased and stabbed to death in a melee, 60 years seems a bit 'too much, at least for an initial screening focused.

Another filter that further narrowed the shortlist was chosen to the exclusion of all persons who were detained during the two weeks with the central day of each crime, with which however does not exclude those who might be unable to kill for other personal reasons. This approximation was not serious, however, because its result was just too little to narrow.

was very serious but the effect of another filter, which sought to limit people to check only those who were arrested after the murder of Scopeti and were still in prison at the time of screening. The aim was clearly to take account of the silence of the Monster in 1985, but the available data we could only rely on the fact that the subject could be or could not be held, thus ignoring many other reasons that could justify his inaction, such as that could simply have decided to stop. And here, on closer inspection, according to common sense Pacciani was out of the pink, because his detention dated back to May 30, 1987, which is why the summer of 1986 could strike again if he wanted. So, choosing him, would have to justify his inaction of a summer for different reasons from a stay in prison. But the anonymous letter in 1985, and the presence of Pacciani also in the first list, fix the problem: in 1986 Pacciani could not have hit so alarmed by the controls subsequent to that letter.

probably other conditions were used children, Roger Perugini talks about in his book " many other factors, such criminal types, any permit and, finally, the possible evidence in the memory of the computer system antimostro . It seems clear, however, the limited usefulness of screening the database of the Ministry, which contained only affected with more information is not detailed enough. That information, along with other PC included in the SAM, could complement research already set on the basis of real evidence, but certainly not be the point of starting from scratch.

dall'inesistente miracle then cleared the field of artificial intelligence technology to help you find the culprit, we can only assume that Pacciani was identified mostly by feel, being a convict free of sexual offenses during the crimes, living in San Casciano and raised in Mugello, and close to all crime scenes, and Last but not least, the subject of an anonymous letter that accused him. The elements which should have been mitigating suspicion on him, such as age and sex characteristics incompatible with those expectations were taken into account only in words.

In conclusion we can therefore say without fear of contradiction, that Peter Pacciani was not entered in the investigation because some witnesses had seen him on a crime scene, or because had betrayed telling someone something, or any other classic elements that might give rise to suspicions about him, but for a mere arbitrary choice, after which it was love without end.

Is The Exchange Rate To Colones Good?

Genius investigation

After a challenging post (for my slender strength) as one that tries to reconstruct the dynamics of the crime of Baccaiano, I would lend a more tranquil.

I found a book in the library which is entitled "The Monster of Florence - The final theory" of a certain Mister Kappa published in 1991 by "Emmekappa Edition", then it would seem self-publish. For this the author must have found obstacles in the state pretentiously on the cover of what is dealing with:

The ruthless and brilliant investigative analysis that has solved the ultimate riddle of the history of international crime.

The dedication, no less pretentious, provides language with epic

I dedicate my discovery of the monster of Florence to its poor victims, their families inconsolable, tireless Rontini Renzo, to the Truth we all have always tried to justice that has been mocked by his own rules, the PM will have to represent the Italian people against him ... What this book is the beginning of the supreme proof that the damn grind to a halt cancer of breathtaking Tuscany, the evil beast called and recognized as the Monster of Florence.

Among the events that revolve around the figure of the Monster of Florence are many oddities, this book of 200 pages is certainly one. The anonymous author, using a method almost by computer analysis, it focuses on the 1968 murder of Signa, convinced, like many others before and after him, to find the key to solving the mystery. I confess to not being able to read the whole book, but I understood more or less content. We examine four "Conjecture", considered all the possible (p. 45):

1. Element arising from nowhere - The Monster of Florence has also committed the crime in 1968, it has nothing to do with the Sardinian clan and this is totally innocent of the crime of 1968

2. The gun used by the Clan Sardo has nothing to do nothing assolitamente - The Monster of Florence by detecting the investigators believe that the use of the Sardinian clan.

3. Track Sardinian external element - The monster Florence is outside the Sardinian clan and seized the .22-caliber after the Sardinian clan killed in 1968 Barbara Locci and Antonio Lo Bianco.

4. Sardinian Track and internal element - The Monster of Florence is an extension of the Sardinian clan is guilty of the crime of 1968

The four assumptions are analyzed and rejected arguments by some shared in part of the whole questionable. Then the author moves on to his "Final Theory", starting from 14 conditions for granted, and reaches the real culprit, which is none other, that's incredible, Natalino Mele, son Barbara Locci and Stefano Mele, the only one able to meet the 14 premises. The already improbable assumptions Charles "by Mario Spezi pales in comparison to the 'Natalino hypothesis," that Mr. Kappa, the genius of the investigation, gives us in his book. The child, who at the age of six years had been forced to witness the violent death of his mother, he would have seized the gun used (!!!!!) 12 years and then made his first crime in Borgo San Lorenzo in 1974.

Delusion author goes on without any hesitation even with a letter to the supposed monster:

Christmas Mele

I'm accused of being the Monster of Florence. The only fault is yours and your father Stefano Mele ... If you are not the monster mutilated that I accuse you of being put on a total provision of justice and truth for resolving the case ... Do not hide behind a finger: millions of people will are watching and want to see the end of history, if you pull back you're finished! ...

If you are innocent you have nothing to lose and to fear, even to help capture the monster of Florence and certainly earn glory, prizes and lots of money!

If continues to remain silent are guilty, but we are many, stubborn and proud, to give you the hunt until you will not nailed to your responsibilities.

The choice is yours, all we will act accordingly!

; ; ; THE AUTHOR

Evidently, according to the eccentric genius of the investigation Mr. Kappa, poor Natalie was not impressed enough by bad luck, after losing both parents at age six, his mother died and the father in jail accused of killing her. I wonder if the Christmas Mele sued, he would have had every right, but maybe not, it seems as if it was a bit 'lost in the bad things of life.

But who is this genius of the investigation? He tells himself when a couple of years later, he published another book, "Pacciani Connection" signed "Mister Kappa aka Caramel Work ". Caramel

work, therefore, a character whom the reader may find itself on the network news.

Wood Fingerboards For Sale

BEYOND THE BARRIERS

Support person meeting demand and supply, process edecativi

4 - "The Republic recognizes all citizens the right to work and promotes the conditions that make it real law. Every citizen has a duty to perform according to their ability and individual choice, activity or function that contributes to the material or spiritual . "

Reading Article 4 of the Constitution of the Italian Republic, the perceived importance of the right to work as a tool for all citizens without distinction of sex, race, language, religion and personal and social conditions, to feel part of society.

Now, we want to focus on the SIL, which stands for job placement service operated by the ASL Monza and Brianza, delegated to the municipalities in the district that covers the collective Caratese Vedano al Lambro until Besana Brianza .

The SIL is present on the territory and Besana Macherio: service in place since September 2009 with offices in our area granted by the previous administration led by Mariarosa Redaelli in close collaboration with the ASL.

In this regard we have had the pleasure of meeting Odilla Cesari, coordinator of the SIL, which told us how it is managed the project, consisting of a psychologist, a coordinator and six teachers spread over both locations.

SIL is aimed at people aged between 16 and 65, with a civil disability equal to or above 46% a free substance, for those who need, a report by the Social Services of the City of residence.

about helping people who have disability and frailty, planning a path in the world of work organized as follows:

- cognitive interview and subsequent meeting with a psychologist and educator

- ; Search educator of a location suitable for the corporate citizen

- accompaniment of people throughout the work process

- The work process will start with an internship lasting from three months to one year, all expenses paid by a dependent of the City.

- At the end of the placement if the person proves to be suitable will be made taking

integral part of this system is the collaboration with companies divided between small, medium and large, artisans, exercises commercial coopertaive social, public and private, with a minimum of 15 employees, through the law 68/99, have a responsibility within two years of the request of the Province, citizens with disabilities. They also can choose the person to enter through the advice of the SIL that, with the help of the educator, constantly monitor the work process from both sides.

Odilla Caesars also wanted to highlight the situation in 2008 as demand for job applications is strongly precipitated by the closure of many small and medium enterprises, due to the severe crisis. We hope that despite the continued cuts by the central government social spending, the SIL and all forms of helping more people in the world of work is still available in the area, to protect and assist citizens, especially those who suffer from disability and frailty.

job placement service

Macherio Seat: Via Roma 38

Tel: 039/2323338

Mail: @ sil.macherio aslmb.it

Gamecopyworld Age Of Empire 3

The dynamics of Baccaiano

We have seen the previous post as an alternative to the official reconstruction of the dynamics of the double murder of Baccaiano proposal Advocate Nino Filastò face water from all sides: to solve a problem it introduces many more. The problem to solve, remember, is the discrepancy between the testimonies of children who had first spoken to Paolo Mainardi seen sitting in the driving seat, and the ambulance arrived later that he had been found on the back seat.

Let's see a possible reconstruction of whole dynamic in which he will also address the problem of the discrepancy between the two testimonies. I shall avail myself of the photos posted on Caliber 22 ( here) and the schemino below. In it are indicated with red rectangles the initial position of the car down on the pitch and end up riding the brink of the ditch. By the numbers shows the nine shell casings found in the timeline that the writer assumed as a logical. The shells are then associated with two wounds to the head of Antony, the four of Paul, two to the head, a left shoulder and jaw and then fired two shots in the headlights. A cartridge case must remain for a shot went in vain. The reconstruction proposed here is not some claim to be the only possible, especially in the sequence of shots fired, it only proves to be reasonable in any case, any criticism would be welcome, provided that interest to someone do it, this does not seem very real.

The beginning of the aggression. The presence on the floor of the car of a condom containing semen tied on with an empty bag and a paper towel stained with semen indicate the consumption of a recent sexual intercourse, especially as the two young men had left the house about an hour first of being attacked. The report was likely to be consumed over the front seats reclined, and certainly not uncomfortable on the back seat of utilitarianism, a Fiat 127 Seat 147 is identical to a good memory. In the photo page 8A 22 gauge you can see the driver's side seat partially reclined in the passenger seat 3 photos completely lifted. The two boys were quite clearly preparing to leave, and, considering that Antonella Migliorini was found on the rear bench, one can only think that the boyfriend had done the courtesy to raise them to the back seat of his (notoriously tricky maneuver on small cars than once, with a knob at times hard to turn), while she, rannicchiatasi behind maneuvering, ended to put in place before returning to the front. E 'reasonable to assume that the interior light was on, as indeed he was spotted by a witness who passed the pitch minutes before the attack. The monster came out just as Paul was pulling on his back, left it in half, giving him the time before starting to shoot the start up and engage the reverse gear to escape. The boy did not, however, took the handbrake, or at least not completely, in fact, was found shot to two-thirds. When leaving the murderess was able to shoot the first 3 shots, shattering the driver's side window and hitting Paul is not serious in his left shoulder Antonella and twice in the head, killing her.

It can be assumed that the target was always the guy tried, and that she is on the line for two shots fruitless, being seated on the right side of the rear bench.

The displacement of the car. As the car was relegated the murderess moved by going back and firing shots 4 or 5, yet the first through the window hitting Paul on the left side of the jaw, as he turned to the right to see the road, the other to the medium that was gaining speed, however, missing the target. The car then ended with the rear wheels in the ditch on the other side of the road. While Paul tried to share but unable to engage the first for the difficulty of maneuvering the clutch without the support of the backrest, the murderess came # 6 firing the shot that left the middle ear through the windshield making it wear out on the seat. Apparently the victim was struck with the head turned to the right while trying to understand what was happening to his girl or the situation of the land.

The preparation for the cutting of the pubis. At this point the murderess had not yet lost hope of being able to enjoy the macabre excision of the pubis, and then first thought to turn off the lights stayed on, firing projectiles at 7:08 at the front and smashing kick those positions. It 'just this last act that demonstrates his willingness to continue with the cut despite the compromised situation, because if the knock out the lights could also be placed during the run-up to the car not to be dazzled, turn off the lights position had no other reasons than those of the darkened area to limit the danger that someone would stop.
When remove the girl from inside the car but noticed that the door was locked from the inside on his side. Then turned the other side to remove the keys from the dashboard through the window now no glass, turn off the interior light if it was still burning.

The arrival of the boys: While the monster was planned for the usual end, the two cars came with the four boys, so he had to hide in the dark around there, maybe even behind ' car at the bottom of the ditch if there was a dry place. Probably with an automatic gesture, put his keys in his pocket just taken. This was the moment when Paolo Mainardi was heard breathing down on the front seat. All participants then ran for help.

Moving Paul accepting the validity of conflicting evidence about the position of Paul Mainardi, we must assume its displacement during the time interval between the departure of four boys and the arrival of stretcher bearers. The poor have been shown to have a very strong fiber, remaining alive for several hours after the attack, in addition we suppose that the Monster, hidden near the car, had not yet fired the fourth shot, the more devastating. Then Paul, after having seen the arrival of the boys may have recovered a lucid moment dragging, facilitated by the back of his seat partially lowered, the rear bench to be close to his girlfriend while awaiting the relief. Unfortunately, the monster was hiding near the car, and, realizing that Paul was still alive and thinking of the danger of a witness who had seen him, put his hand inside the car through the broken window and hit him behind the left ear while it was turned to Antonio. The ejected cartridge case was found on the right rear pad, clearly bounced first on the left wall.

Escape. At this point, the monster could do was flee, and during the trip got rid of the keys that he had put in his pocket. Unfortunately you can not understand where these keys were found, perhaps rather far from the scene of the crime, and therefore their position could make us guess the area where the car was parked murderer.

seems unconnected to the crime scene somewhere around the discovery of an empty box of a sedative, the Norzetam, which some think might be served at the monster to overcome a panic attack. Considering that the effect comes after a half hour would be very strange if the murderess, committed to escape the imminent arrival of relief, had taken a tablet near the site of the murders. Probably someone had thrown out the window of her car passing in front of it.

How Toreset The Number Lock In Vip Suitcase

The Razor Filastò

Of all the murders attributed to the dual monster Florence in 1982 to Baccaiano is certainly the most difficult to interpret, not because his motives are always the same as for its dynamics. The fact that the murderess does not make a macabre ritual removal of the pubic area is widely considered a consequence of the pressure of events, and not a choice. But where there are many different ideas and the progress of omicidaria. I invite the reader, before continuing to read well on the Caliber 22 page dedicated , where beautiful pictures and excellent considerations (some of which made my own) can help you better understand what is being discussed.

The crime was the only one in which the means mechanism was moved from the starting point of aggression. When the monster began to shoot it, the car carrying Antonella Migliorini and Paolo Mainardi was parked in a lay-by adjacent to the current road in the town of New Virginia Montespertoli, as witnessed by three shells and fragments of glass left front broken, as rescuers found it on the opposite side of the road with the rear wheels finished in the kennel side, hopelessly blocked. According to the official story, the Monster had surprised the two lovers as they were composing after sex (as evidenced by a condom containing semen found on board), her on the back seat, him in the front seat. The boy was probably already aware of the danger before the murderess opened fire, igniting the engine and engaging the reverse gear to flee, given that the car was parked with its tail on the road. The show had started shooting continued even during the course of the car in reverse, until this had not stopped in that position already. Two more rounds to turn off the headlights and one with his hand inside the vehicle for delivering the coup de grace to the boy. The keys were taken out of context and thrown away. The arrival of two cars with four guys on board who seemed suspicious from the scene of an accident they flee the aggressor. The people who took part knew at once what had happened and called for help, which pulled out unconscious but alive Paolo Mainardi, while Antonella Migliorini there was nothing to do. Even though the boy died a few hours later without regaining consciousness.

This reconstruction was confirmed in principle by the statements of so-called repentant Giancarlo Lotti during the trial of Mario Vanni, and then challenged these hard defender of the Advocate, Nino Filastò, who wanted to demonstrate that the lot was lying. The complaint was based on the testimony of the rescuers intervened after the first alarm given by the boys rushed to the scene. If in fact the latter had claimed to have Paolo Mainardi seen sitting in the driver's seat, the stretcher bearers who rescued reported to have found it sitting next to his girlfriend on the back seat. Giving credence to this second testimony and it considered the other an error due to the heat of the moment, the lawyer suggested, therefore, a reconstruction of the completely different, you can read in his book "History of snacks infamous" to p. 381-388. According to the time of the attack Filastò Antoine and Paul are both on the back seat still willing to make love after a previous relationship. After being hit, the Monster would have started driving the car to move in a less conspicuous place in order can be made with greater confidence excision of the pubis, as the car was clearly visible from the busy street New Virginia. But during the maneuver in reverse out the murderess was disturbed by the reaction of the girl, writes Filastò still alive and , which fired the fatal blow while losing control of the car crash that ended well for the position in which was later found. After trying unsuccessfully to restart the monster would come out to shoot the latest hits to the lights stayed on and still with Paul Mainardi, then flee help arrives.

Unfortunately the reconstruction of the lawyer has many weaknesses that make it cumbersome and wholly implausible, making him forget his beloved principle of "Occam's Razor", which states that the simplest solution is always preferable. Actually it's not even the only case where this happens, we will see in future posts, so much so that one could speak of "Razor Filastò", a revised and corrected according to its criteria of the original. Let

still major weaknesses in the reconstruction of Filastò.

The position of both boys on the back seat can not find any justification. If they wanted to make love because they do not lower the front seat backrests, as everyone would have done? In fact the car was found with the back of the driver's seat almost all the way down (but not entirely), as you can see from the photo on page 8A of the Caliber 22. The back of the front seat passenger side was completely hand raised (photo 3, however, must be enlarged to understand it). This scenario describes well a time when the two boys were about to leave, as we shall see later.

Paolo Mainardi If at the time of the attack was in the back seat, because the bullets shattered the glass front window?

seems incomprehensible Filastò reconstruction of the position of some of the shells traced. It was found three on the space next to the fragments of broken glass (the driver), witnessing the beginning of the aggression. Why did the Monster would be limited to only fire three times now completely non-neutralizing its victims, as he had and would always do that? Two other shells were found just off the pitch by the roadside, perhaps one of the two still inside the lot but in any case with the three above. In the reconstruction Filastò not clear when they would be fired. The monster, after leaving the car stuck, he crossed the street to shoot from the opposite? Why?

The exit from the pitch back down in a busy street seems more the gesture of a person in panic rather than that of a murderess proved always cold in his actions. More logical would be to do some maneuvering to get out with the muzzle on.

The car was found with the reverse gear engaged and the parking brake partially engaged. If the monster had been driving was first lowered the handbrake, but understandably not maneuver carried out by Paolo Mainardi panic. Then attempting to refloat the machine logic would say that the driver would have to engage first. The vehicle was not in fact in a quagmire, where a back and forth could possibly do the job, but tilted dangerously to the brink of a ditch, therefore, any backward movement would have worsened the situation. The injured boy is understandable that there is not able to change gears.

The extensive blood stain on the driver's seat (Fig. 8A to Caliber page 22) does not seem to be justified by the flood that Filastò assumed to be released from the wounds of Paul Mainardi while being pulled out.

Finally, the testimony of the first speakers, that they realized that Paul was still alive hearing him breathe. How could they have confused about his position? If they were heard to breathe a few inches. On the other hand, even the testimony of the ambulance did not appear to be challenged, then there must be an explanation that the lawyer, in his anxiety to prove the lies of the lot, does not even take into consideration. We will attempt here, in the next post.

Do Antibiotics Help With Cervical Mucus

hypothesis "Carlo" A screening

Among the hypotheses that attempt to explain the mystery of the passage of the gun between the group that supposedly killed in the Monster Signa and there is a proposal by Mario Spezi in his "Hills of Blood". The journalist tells of a Belgian writer named Ethel who would come into possession of a copy of a complaint of theft at home by Salvatore Vinci. The theft would have occurred in June 1974, three months before the murder of Borgo San Lorenzo, the first of the Monster. Ethel is a fancy name, but the person is real, and should correspond to Magdalen NABBA, now deceased English writer who lived in Florence and wrote a book in English The Monster Of Florence that she did not want to be published in Italian.

Returning to the complaint of theft, it must be said that Salvatore Vinci, surveys conducted as part of Track Sarda and journalistic reconstructions is the same Spezi both Cecioni and Monastra in their book, it seemed somehow been the organizer of the crime of Signa, among other things, that procured the gun, free from a relative of Villacidro his home in Sardinia. In addition Stefano Mele, on the order made by the gun, after the first version where it said he threw it away near the scene of the crime, claims to have returned had they given to Salvatore Vinci.

The theft report was not shown what was stolen, in fact, a complaint of theft would seem that most of trespassing. The hypothesis of Ethel, who endorses Mario Spezi, what was in that theft would be reduced by the infamous Beretta 22-caliber cartridge that includes the box with the left after the murder of Signa. Who stole the gun would then become the dreaded Monster of Florence. For the moment let's forget that the character is listed as author of the theft and then future (very unlikely) serial killer, let's concentrate on the fact that enough water is already on its behalf. Who says that the gun was among the stolen items, especially among the things to steal?

It 'hard to believe that Salvatore Vinci took home for six years in a weapon that would have accused of a crime, even with the box of cartridges remaining, further evidence against him. More so that the character is described by Mario Spezi as a very shrewd. Not only that, Salvatore Vinci with his DECLARED implicitly told the Police: "If found the Beretta 22 gauge with which they were killed Barbara Locci and Antonio Lo Bianco tenetemela part because it is mine! .

Let us now turn to the person who allegedly stole the possible future show. In "Hills of Blood" is given a fancy name "Charles", who then also marked the whole situation, but there is nothing that reinvent the wheel, identifying him with Antonio Vinci, son of Salvatore and Barbarina Steri, fifteen in 1974. The boy would react to the trauma of the loss of his mother, perhaps, perhaps killed by her father committed suicide, putting to kill couples with the same gun Signa. This is quite clearly a case of romance, without any evidence. In "Hills of Blood" is looking for some way to strengthen it by invoking some sort of compatibility with the figure of Antonio Vinci known FBI profile, where U.S. experts had traced an identikit psychological monster, very coarse-grained to say the truth. There is no need here to comment on these parallels laughable leggerseli invite the interested reader to the book (p. 241), here I give just one example:

The Americans have made a murderess who usually try to get this type of in contact with the police groped for detecting or otherwise, to pilfer the news. Our guy did the informant of the police.

The coincidences are of this type, the reader may judge for themselves of their minimum thickness. Finally common sense is hard to see in a young man guilty of murder in the first 15 years and 26 last, moreover, described as beautiful and defiant, and not at all iposessuato, despite a formal annulment of marriage impotentia coeundi . The coincidence that from January 1975 to the end of 1980, then in the period in which the dual murders ceased, the character had lived in northern Italy does not prove anything, if anything, we would wonder why he was so fond of the area around Florence, where he enjoyed killing could have done elsewhere.

The very fact that the book ends with an interview with the supposed monster in which serious allegations are dealt with tarallucci and Sardinian myrtle, shows that this is a gimmick to give a sop the reader of the book is at the end without a fault, in which the protagonist must surely have given his consent in question. How can we believe in fact that Anthony Vinci has not exercised the thousand American lawyers willing to represent him for free for a fair share of damages that certainly could have asked for the serious and unsubstantiated accusation? It appears that the United States has circulated his picture with a lot of information: "Here's the Monster of Florence". A real trick, in fact.