Old Webcam Installations

The towel Giuttari

Michele Giuttari When he wrote his second book on the affair, "The Monster", the investigations in the Esoteric track had been shown all over their failure. It was in 2005, the fanciful theories about wizards and witches, secret sects and false leads had proved all bubbles burst by now, and he was finally out of what remained of the investigation, in addition or in the process of being investigated for abuse of office.

Giuttari In the final pages of the book tries to leave the reader with the feeling that his work was interrupted just as had happened on something big, which could be sensational developments.

We see what it is.

leafing through the old papers in a desperate search for something that could help give new life to stagnant investigations, the investigator had happened on the news of the existence of a report ordered up a tissue found by the curious on the pitch via Scopeti few days after the crime, though rather far from the crime scene, "a discovery unimaginable," according to his words (p.334). The tissue was stained with blood, a hair attached, and roll a couple of small rubber gloves. In the binder the findings were, but not the expertise. Taken from the frenzy to get their hands on evidence that his colleagues had failed and that he thought they could hide something big, racing Giuttari sent an aide to the Institute of Forensic Medicine where the survey was carried out immediately in order to have a copy. Although the offices were closed, nearly midnight his collaborator rang at his home in triumph with the expertise in hand. All this story is on pages 335-344 of "The Monster", but this is clearly fictional literature. He wrote the attorney Adriani Vieri in his magnificent document reported here several times:

... It is not clear how that expertise could not bear ... to the proceedings (so that it would be necessary to send an officer judicial police to get it in the late evening at the Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Florence), when the computer in question must have always found in the folders of the investigation Pacciani against Peter. Not for nothing has been able to trace the writer's expertise Cagli quite simply among the papers of the College that preceded it, kept together with all other expert witnesses in that proceeding.

The survey reported the blood group of the traces of blood on the handkerchief, the very popular B, that neither of the Companions of the victims or had snacks. Even small gloves could not have been worn by Pacciani and others. In addition, a hair belonging to a subject of group B was found in the hands of the prostitute frequented by Clelia Cuscito Mario Vanni and killed in Florence by the "maniac of prostitutes" in 1983. It also adds that Giancarlo Lotti had spoken of a mysterious car with two people having the street on the evening of the murder of two French. These ingredients is more than enough to imagine the usual investigator mysterious scenes that had become its own specialty, " For me there can be no doubt that these objects had to do with the crime ."

But what probative value can be attributed to that tissue soaked in blood?

" Two miles of cars in line for a picnic in the forest of death " This is the subtitle of an article in "The Nation" on 16 September 1985. The macabre curiosity of people brought hundreds of people on the scene the next few days, imagine that some of them may have cut snooping around and that someone (surely a woman, given the extent of gloves) to have her medicated is not difficult. Then possible that the specimens had escaped the researches of the Scientific Police, who at that time had finally tried to do the work that had to be done?

In his book, the detective leaves us with the curiosity to know the result of the DNA, which at the time not exist and that instead he had ordered, and that course appeared to his superiors did not want. An examination was then carried out, we hear what he says Vieri Adriani:

In short, counsel for the prosecutor established that the bloodstains "are attributable to a male whose profile geographical origin estimated by genetic means 'Eastern Europe'. The profile of the Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA have shown that 'haplotypes' found in the Europe of' East, in particular between the Bulgarian and Turkish populations.

Hence that is realized the possibility of an international branch of the sect who was behind the terrible crimes of the monster, or maybe it was just a curious stranger?

The reader may judge for himself.

Knee Pain And Locking Up

investigator or novelist?

I have already mentioned in the post "Who killed Barbara Locci" Pacciani improbable solution found in the investigation to explain the connection of the crime Signa with the next. The way chosen in the investigation of the Companions of snacks was totally different, equally unlikely and not supported by any but certainly more articulate and charming architecture: the qualities of novelist Michael Giuttari obviously made the difference. It was not called into question the matrix of Sardinia that first crime, but to explain the use of the same weapon in Vanni and those made subsequently by Pacciani you tried to connect to one of the two protagonists of the Sardinian slope, Francesco Vinci, also died and unable to counter, through which it would occur the transition. Let us see what were the main factors that allowed the investigator to make the astonishing hypothesis. Giancarlo Lotti

course was to provide the first and most important link, enriching, with the proven technique of gradual adjustment, the first version given by him about the murder of 1983 in Giogoli. In this case it is clear that the wily sorry he strove to meet the expectations of investigators, and thus maintain their status of protected witness, unless you wish to legitimately suspect the reverse link. Here is how he told the PG Daniele Propato during the appeal process:

On June 12, '96 he was asked whether he had heard that this murder was done because someone was in prison and had to go out and Lotti says "I have not heard of this." On 15 July, asking lots of talk with PM speaks of Vinci, which has seen him twice, once alone, with a beard, then saw him with the Vanni and the Vanni said that was the person who had to leave. In this circumstance confirmation hearing lots of Vinci.

And so, after denying a specific request to know anything about Francesco Vinci, Giancarlo Lotti spent a month said that the two German boys had been killed, had said Vanni, for " to a sorting out of prison , Francesco Vinci fact, since then in the company of the same Vanni twice in San Casciano. It is worth mentioning that at that time the subject was under the witness protection program, " a golden hen which occasionally go to ask the eggs, "wrote Francesco Ferri as in his" The case Pacciani. In fact, that the lot has involved the now-defunct Francesco Vinci, satisfying the expectations of those who questioned him as a suspect is a certainty. Why would it first claimed to know nothing and then, after a month, change your mind? In this case you can not rely on the usual grounds of inner struggle or attempt to diminish its responsibility, the fact does not in fact called into question, so if something really knew nothing would prevent him to report it immediately.

Michele Giuttari found, however, other witnesses ready to give manforte to support his hypothesis. One of these was John Calamosca, the character from which Francesco Vinci had taken refuge before his arrest as a suspected murderess and later suspected him. When questioned, he reported that Vinci had confided to him that the crime of 1968 would have made him and Stefano Mele, and immediately after the gun was sold to those responsible for subsequent offenses. Vinci would then blackmailed people which had given the weapon, and this would be done outside. The same story Calamosca confirmed it in a deposition that lasted two hours during the trial of the Companions of snacks. To fully assess the reliability of the witness is is worth mentioning that the same occasion was also reported Calamosca confidences made to him by Pacciani common during the detention, under which he would have had a child by Miranda Bugli, the girlfriend of 1951, but did not live with him. The reaction of the farmer was exemplary

But you put the numbers in the lottery, here are all silly as a mental hospital with the Miranda I love you but then you let the fact that grabbed a more. The I had to marry, but there was the process, We have already said all of this. But as a son, had told her the true process .

And when should have been born this unknown son of Pacciani? The woman had been (wrongly) convicted along with former boyfriend as his accomplice, and out of prison was then married in 1957, while he remained there until 1964. On the other hand a story like that would certainly not have remained secret, it was just a pure invention. In a subsequent interview with the television program "Who has seen" Calamosca said then that he thought Vanni and Pacciani were innocent and that the real monster is going to kill Francesco Vinci's lover Milva Malatesta. The desire of the subject of leadership was clearly very strong.

Michele Giuttari also found another character of the prisons in the world willing to provide supporting evidence for links to the Sardinian slope, of which there is no trace statements in "The monster", but that in the previous " Companions of blood" would take many pages . It was Joseph Sgangarella, sentenced to life imprisonment for raping and murdering a girl of eight, he is in prison acquaintance of Pietro Pacciani both Francesco Vinci, to whom he had gathered some confidence. The investigator questioned him coming so I know that Win, Vanni and Pacciani have attended along a deserted farmhouse in the countryside of San Casciano for " do tarot cards and predict the future , "and that the Vinci was paying for friends." The despicable individual told many other lies, it only takes one for all, Pacciani in his cell, " ... celebrating Mass on Sunday morning on his own according to the rite of black magic ... he used candles and satanic images ... on issues and peel of cheese. " Of course, no other inmate confirmed the fact, even Aldo Bochicchio, also questioned him for Giuttari, who had shared the cell with Pacciani for a couple of months.

It 's time to summarize the entire reconstruction Michele Giuttari had in mind, as can be deduced from his books, or at least believed to have understood how the writer. With it would take two birds with one stone: to explain the passage of the gun by the Sardinians to fellow snacks and make more concrete the presence of the dome of the commissioners, thereby entering fully into the esoteric track. But let's degrees.

As suggested, it seems, by Gabriella Carlizzi, at the dawn of the whole affair the sect who later commissioned the crimes of the monster needed a gun 'dirty', ie that he had already killed, in order to obtain more energy from the satanic fetishes torn future female victims. He was then asked for help to the famous magician I guess, obviously He also linked to the sect, whose house was the home of magical rituals and black masses. The friendly atmosphere was attended by the Companions of snacks and also by Francesco Vinci, Sardinian which would remain in his gun after the murder of Signa, of which he was responsible along with Stefano Mele. The self-styled magician then asked to Win the infamous Francesco Beretta, date and Vanni Pacciani then recruited to commit the crimes as requested by the heads of the sect. When Francesco Vinci

years after he was accused and arrested for the crimes of the monster in the Sardinian slope, threatened to sue those who had given the gun, asking in exchange for his silence to be cleared through a new crime. As we all know was promptly answered by the Companions of snacks with the killing of two German Giogoli poor children in 1983. But the turbulent character had not yet finished creating problems, crimes terminated because of the revelations began to threaten again, he wanted money, and then August 7, 1993, on behalf of the mysterious sect, was tortured, mutilated, killed and then burned together with the 'friend Angelo Vargas. A few days later was also killed his lover, Milva Malatesta, along with three years of son Mirko.

Here ends the romantic reconstruction work of Michele Giuttari lively imagination, that it is hard to criticize all the wires seem to perfection. Too bad it lacks any feedback. Only some small detail I'd like to know more. The first: the sect had bought the gun from Salvatore Vinci to perform the killings, but was a photocopy of what he would have been a Signa, so he bought the idea? The second: the gun changed hands by 1974, when he was made the first double murder at the hands of officers of the sect, but for the first collection of fetishes had to wait another seven years. Why? The third: the seven years he was entrusted to a grotesque band of outcasts for the crimes of the couples, however, to eliminate Francesco Vinci and the lover had used the real experts who have tortured, incaprettarono, burned, simulated an accident. Why this double behavior? The principals had finally learned that everyone should do their job?

The reader can judge for themselves once again as above, personally I can hardly believe that the professionals within the judiciary may even have considered such a situation as possible. The attempt by Michele Giuttari to connect the track with Fellow Sarda snacks in order to solve the eternal riddle of the gun, is very awkward at the end, resting only on late declarations Giancarlo Lotti without the minimum feedback and testimonials Individuals interested in a misunderstanding probably gain of some kind. The rest is just pure fantasy, a daring rebuilding far-fetched in the context of the appalling track Esoteric.

Best Puzzle Game 2009

Screening

How Peter came to suspect Pacciani? Perhaps it is not quite known, but appears to have been a computer to suggest the name to investigators. Perugini When Roger took over in 1986 with Sandro Federico head of the SAM (Anti Monster Squad), not had nothing to work with, if not a mountain of anonymous letters. To integrate the unreliability of the information available, thought it well to benefit from new techniques. The SAM was supplied with a PC where the data had been included thousands who had come in contact with the surveys of Monster, for anonymous reporting, searches or other controls. From this database was extracted a list of 82 names from that street crime in Scopeti then had been somewhat alarmed by the attentions of law enforcement, and this may be deterred from killing again. Pacciani, by virtue of an anonymous letter received in 1985 and the subsequent search that could have worried, was among 82 individuals selected.

A second list was provided by the Data Processing Centre of the Ministry of Justice. He asked the technicians to query their database using a set of selection conditions (or filters) that ultimately will yield a list of 26 names of individuals highly suspected, among them was still that of Peter Pacciani, which was the only one present in both lists. But the result of work done by the Ministry of the computer could not be left to chance. Here's why, trying to rebuild the main conditions for the selection of what can be deduced from what he can read books that deal with, not always agree with each other.

First they took the examination in males born or living in Tuscany who had to do with justice, in short, undermined, since the database contained only available to their names. So if the monster had never been arrested, everything was falling miserably from the outset.

To narrow the search were filtered only those who were aged between 30 and 60 years on the last murder in 1985. It 'obvious that the breadth of the range would change the number of persons selected, and the fact that the extreme upper , 60, matched his age of Pacciani could suspect that he had been chosen for the purpose of including himself in the list, an a posteriori justification, in other words. Wanting to be even more evil, you might notice that the subject was born January 7, 1925, so the 8 September 1985 had already exceeded 60 years 8 months. However, considering the dynamics of the murder of Scopeti street where the boy was chased and stabbed to death in a melee, 60 years seems a bit 'too much, at least for an initial screening focused.

Another filter that further narrowed the shortlist was chosen to the exclusion of all persons who were detained during the two weeks with the central day of each crime, with which however does not exclude those who might be unable to kill for other personal reasons. This approximation was not serious, however, because its result was just too little to narrow.

was very serious but the effect of another filter, which sought to limit people to check only those who were arrested after the murder of Scopeti and were still in prison at the time of screening. The aim was clearly to take account of the silence of the Monster in 1985, but the available data we could only rely on the fact that the subject could be or could not be held, thus ignoring many other reasons that could justify his inaction, such as that could simply have decided to stop. And here, on closer inspection, according to common sense Pacciani was out of the pink, because his detention dated back to May 30, 1987, which is why the summer of 1986 could strike again if he wanted. So, choosing him, would have to justify his inaction of a summer for different reasons from a stay in prison. But the anonymous letter in 1985, and the presence of Pacciani also in the first list, fix the problem: in 1986 Pacciani could not have hit so alarmed by the controls subsequent to that letter.

probably other conditions were used children, Roger Perugini talks about in his book " many other factors, such criminal types, any permit and, finally, the possible evidence in the memory of the computer system antimostro . It seems clear, however, the limited usefulness of screening the database of the Ministry, which contained only affected with more information is not detailed enough. That information, along with other PC included in the SAM, could complement research already set on the basis of real evidence, but certainly not be the point of starting from scratch.

dall'inesistente miracle then cleared the field of artificial intelligence technology to help you find the culprit, we can only assume that Pacciani was identified mostly by feel, being a convict free of sexual offenses during the crimes, living in San Casciano and raised in Mugello, and close to all crime scenes, and Last but not least, the subject of an anonymous letter that accused him. The elements which should have been mitigating suspicion on him, such as age and sex characteristics incompatible with those expectations were taken into account only in words.

In conclusion we can therefore say without fear of contradiction, that Peter Pacciani was not entered in the investigation because some witnesses had seen him on a crime scene, or because had betrayed telling someone something, or any other classic elements that might give rise to suspicions about him, but for a mere arbitrary choice, after which it was love without end.

Is The Exchange Rate To Colones Good?

Genius investigation

After a challenging post (for my slender strength) as one that tries to reconstruct the dynamics of the crime of Baccaiano, I would lend a more tranquil.

I found a book in the library which is entitled "The Monster of Florence - The final theory" of a certain Mister Kappa published in 1991 by "Emmekappa Edition", then it would seem self-publish. For this the author must have found obstacles in the state pretentiously on the cover of what is dealing with:

The ruthless and brilliant investigative analysis that has solved the ultimate riddle of the history of international crime.

The dedication, no less pretentious, provides language with epic

I dedicate my discovery of the monster of Florence to its poor victims, their families inconsolable, tireless Rontini Renzo, to the Truth we all have always tried to justice that has been mocked by his own rules, the PM will have to represent the Italian people against him ... What this book is the beginning of the supreme proof that the damn grind to a halt cancer of breathtaking Tuscany, the evil beast called and recognized as the Monster of Florence.

Among the events that revolve around the figure of the Monster of Florence are many oddities, this book of 200 pages is certainly one. The anonymous author, using a method almost by computer analysis, it focuses on the 1968 murder of Signa, convinced, like many others before and after him, to find the key to solving the mystery. I confess to not being able to read the whole book, but I understood more or less content. We examine four "Conjecture", considered all the possible (p. 45):

1. Element arising from nowhere - The Monster of Florence has also committed the crime in 1968, it has nothing to do with the Sardinian clan and this is totally innocent of the crime of 1968

2. The gun used by the Clan Sardo has nothing to do nothing assolitamente - The Monster of Florence by detecting the investigators believe that the use of the Sardinian clan.

3. Track Sardinian external element - The monster Florence is outside the Sardinian clan and seized the .22-caliber after the Sardinian clan killed in 1968 Barbara Locci and Antonio Lo Bianco.

4. Sardinian Track and internal element - The Monster of Florence is an extension of the Sardinian clan is guilty of the crime of 1968

The four assumptions are analyzed and rejected arguments by some shared in part of the whole questionable. Then the author moves on to his "Final Theory", starting from 14 conditions for granted, and reaches the real culprit, which is none other, that's incredible, Natalino Mele, son Barbara Locci and Stefano Mele, the only one able to meet the 14 premises. The already improbable assumptions Charles "by Mario Spezi pales in comparison to the 'Natalino hypothesis," that Mr. Kappa, the genius of the investigation, gives us in his book. The child, who at the age of six years had been forced to witness the violent death of his mother, he would have seized the gun used (!!!!!) 12 years and then made his first crime in Borgo San Lorenzo in 1974.

Delusion author goes on without any hesitation even with a letter to the supposed monster:

Christmas Mele

I'm accused of being the Monster of Florence. The only fault is yours and your father Stefano Mele ... If you are not the monster mutilated that I accuse you of being put on a total provision of justice and truth for resolving the case ... Do not hide behind a finger: millions of people will are watching and want to see the end of history, if you pull back you're finished! ...

If you are innocent you have nothing to lose and to fear, even to help capture the monster of Florence and certainly earn glory, prizes and lots of money!

If continues to remain silent are guilty, but we are many, stubborn and proud, to give you the hunt until you will not nailed to your responsibilities.

The choice is yours, all we will act accordingly!

; ; ; THE AUTHOR

Evidently, according to the eccentric genius of the investigation Mr. Kappa, poor Natalie was not impressed enough by bad luck, after losing both parents at age six, his mother died and the father in jail accused of killing her. I wonder if the Christmas Mele sued, he would have had every right, but maybe not, it seems as if it was a bit 'lost in the bad things of life.

But who is this genius of the investigation? He tells himself when a couple of years later, he published another book, "Pacciani Connection" signed "Mister Kappa aka Caramel Work ". Caramel

work, therefore, a character whom the reader may find itself on the network news.